A Bayesian framework for the development of belief-desire reasoning: Estimating inhibitory power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A robust empirical finding in theory-of-mind (ToM) reasoning, as measured by standard false-belief tasks, is that children four years old or older succeed whereas three-year-olds typically fail in predicting a person’s behavior based on an attributed false belief. Nevertheless, when the child’s own belief is undermined by increasing their subjective uncertainty about the truth, as introduced in low-demand false-belief tasks, three-year-olds can better appreciate another person’s false belief. Inhibition is believed to play a critical role in such developmental patterns. Within a Bayesian framework, using meta-data, we present the first computational implementation of inhibition, as specified by the Theory of Mind Mechanism (ToMM) model, to account for both the developmental shift from three to four years of age and the change in children’s performances between high-demand and low-demand false-belief tasks. A Bayesian framework enables us to evaluate the predictive power of the model and infer the underlying psychological parameters. Together with behavioral evidence, we discuss the critical role of inhibitory control, as specified by ToMM, in children’s theory-of-mind development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-221
Number of pages17
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2019

Fingerprint

Theory of Mind
Uncertainty
Power (Psychology)
Belief-desire Reasoning
Psychology
False Belief Task
Person
False Belief
Inhibition (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{5cc25ab4013f413484d7b193f3f115fd,
title = "A Bayesian framework for the development of belief-desire reasoning: Estimating inhibitory power",
abstract = "A robust empirical finding in theory-of-mind (ToM) reasoning, as measured by standard false-belief tasks, is that children four years old or older succeed whereas three-year-olds typically fail in predicting a person’s behavior based on an attributed false belief. Nevertheless, when the child’s own belief is undermined by increasing their subjective uncertainty about the truth, as introduced in low-demand false-belief tasks, three-year-olds can better appreciate another person’s false belief. Inhibition is believed to play a critical role in such developmental patterns. Within a Bayesian framework, using meta-data, we present the first computational implementation of inhibition, as specified by the Theory of Mind Mechanism (ToMM) model, to account for both the developmental shift from three to four years of age and the change in children’s performances between high-demand and low-demand false-belief tasks. A Bayesian framework enables us to evaluate the predictive power of the model and infer the underlying psychological parameters. Together with behavioral evidence, we discuss the critical role of inhibitory control, as specified by ToMM, in children’s theory-of-mind development.",
author = "Lu Wang and Pernille Hemmer and Alan Leslie",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1507-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "205--221",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

A Bayesian framework for the development of belief-desire reasoning : Estimating inhibitory power. / Wang, Lu; Hemmer, Pernille; Leslie, Alan.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 15.02.2019, p. 205-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Bayesian framework for the development of belief-desire reasoning

T2 - Estimating inhibitory power

AU - Wang, Lu

AU - Hemmer, Pernille

AU - Leslie, Alan

PY - 2019/2/15

Y1 - 2019/2/15

N2 - A robust empirical finding in theory-of-mind (ToM) reasoning, as measured by standard false-belief tasks, is that children four years old or older succeed whereas three-year-olds typically fail in predicting a person’s behavior based on an attributed false belief. Nevertheless, when the child’s own belief is undermined by increasing their subjective uncertainty about the truth, as introduced in low-demand false-belief tasks, three-year-olds can better appreciate another person’s false belief. Inhibition is believed to play a critical role in such developmental patterns. Within a Bayesian framework, using meta-data, we present the first computational implementation of inhibition, as specified by the Theory of Mind Mechanism (ToMM) model, to account for both the developmental shift from three to four years of age and the change in children’s performances between high-demand and low-demand false-belief tasks. A Bayesian framework enables us to evaluate the predictive power of the model and infer the underlying psychological parameters. Together with behavioral evidence, we discuss the critical role of inhibitory control, as specified by ToMM, in children’s theory-of-mind development.

AB - A robust empirical finding in theory-of-mind (ToM) reasoning, as measured by standard false-belief tasks, is that children four years old or older succeed whereas three-year-olds typically fail in predicting a person’s behavior based on an attributed false belief. Nevertheless, when the child’s own belief is undermined by increasing their subjective uncertainty about the truth, as introduced in low-demand false-belief tasks, three-year-olds can better appreciate another person’s false belief. Inhibition is believed to play a critical role in such developmental patterns. Within a Bayesian framework, using meta-data, we present the first computational implementation of inhibition, as specified by the Theory of Mind Mechanism (ToMM) model, to account for both the developmental shift from three to four years of age and the change in children’s performances between high-demand and low-demand false-belief tasks. A Bayesian framework enables us to evaluate the predictive power of the model and infer the underlying psychological parameters. Together with behavioral evidence, we discuss the critical role of inhibitory control, as specified by ToMM, in children’s theory-of-mind development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050358879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050358879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1507-9

DO - https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1507-9

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 205

EP - 221

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 1

ER -