A historical interpretation of deceptive experiments in American psychology

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    In debate over the ethics of deceptive experiments in American psychology, commentators often provide an inaccurate history of these experiments. This happens especially where writers portray experimental deception as a necessary accompaniment to human experiments, rather than a conscious choice based on values attached to persons and scientific inquiry. Compounding the error, commentators typically give a misleading portrayal of psychologists' attitudes and procedures. Commentators frequently cite Stanley Milgram's work in the 1960s as a harbinger of changed attitudes towards deception, and suggest that today's psychologists abide by more enlightened ethical practices. It is difficult to find evidence to support this portrayal.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-36
    Number of pages14
    JournalHistory of the Human Sciences
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • History
    • History and Philosophy of Science


    • American psychology
    • Experiments
    • Milgram
    • Scientific inquiry


    Dive into the research topics of 'A historical interpretation of deceptive experiments in American psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this