TY - JOUR
T1 - An immanent critique of the prison nation
T2 - The contradictions of carceral “anti-violence”
AU - Boodman, Eva
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/6/1
Y1 - 2018/6/1
N2 - More women are currently incarcerated than at any other time in US history. Though the United States has begun to acknowledge mass incarceration as an international embarrassment, the discourse has centered on men of color, and the experiences and consequences of US mass incarceration for women of color have been largely ignored. This is the case in spite of a now strong mainstream, institutionalized movement to end violence against women, and a growing prison reform movement ostensibly meant to help vulnerable women. This paper uses the method of immanent critique to explain why women of color have been left behind by reform strategies, and to make a normative argument for abolitionist strategies. I use Beth E. Richie’s analysis of the failure of the feminist anti-violence movement to protect poor women of color, to expose the contradictory circumstance that turns “public safety” and “anti-violence” against the women they claim to protect, and to argue that reform is not enough.
AB - More women are currently incarcerated than at any other time in US history. Though the United States has begun to acknowledge mass incarceration as an international embarrassment, the discourse has centered on men of color, and the experiences and consequences of US mass incarceration for women of color have been largely ignored. This is the case in spite of a now strong mainstream, institutionalized movement to end violence against women, and a growing prison reform movement ostensibly meant to help vulnerable women. This paper uses the method of immanent critique to explain why women of color have been left behind by reform strategies, and to make a normative argument for abolitionist strategies. I use Beth E. Richie’s analysis of the failure of the feminist anti-violence movement to protect poor women of color, to expose the contradictory circumstance that turns “public safety” and “anti-violence” against the women they claim to protect, and to argue that reform is not enough.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047563103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047563103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453717730873
DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453717730873
M3 - Article
SN - 0191-4537
VL - 44
SP - 571
EP - 592
JO - Philosophy and Social Criticism
JF - Philosophy and Social Criticism
IS - 5
ER -