Blood from a stone: Performance of catch-only methods in estimating stock biomass status

Christopher M. Free, Olaf P. Jensen, Sean C. Anderson, Nicolas L. Gutierrez, Kristin M. Kleisner, Catherine Longo, Cóilín Minto, Giacomo Chato Osio, Jessica C. Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Demand for data-limited stock assessment methods is increasing, and new methods are being developed rapidly. One class of these methods requires only catch time series and, in some cases, information about life history or fishery characteristics, to estimate stock status. These catch-only methods (COMs) range from statistical models trained on data-rich stocks to mechanistic population models that make assumptions about changes in fishing effort. We review 11 COMs, comparing performance through application to data-rich stocks and simulated fisheries. The catch-only methods evaluated here produce imprecise and biased estimates of B/BMSY, especially for stocks that are lightly exploited. They were also generally poor classifiers of stock status. While no method performed best across all stocks, ensembles of multiple COMs generally performed better than individual COMs. We advocate for testing new COMs using this common platform. We also caution that performance in estimating stock status is not sufficient for gauging the usefulness of COMs in managing fisheries. Greater use of management strategy evaluation is needed before COMs can be considered a reliable tool for management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105452
JournalFisheries Research
Volume223
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2020

Fingerprint

blood
biomass
methodology
fishery
fisheries
method
stone
stock assessment
fishing effort
assessment method
statistical models
life history
time series analysis
time series

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aquatic Science

Keywords

  • Catch-only methods
  • Data-limited fisheries
  • Data-poor fisheries
  • Ensemble methods
  • Stock assessment
  • Stock status

Cite this

Free, C. M., Jensen, O. P., Anderson, S. C., Gutierrez, N. L., Kleisner, K. M., Longo, C., ... Walsh, J. C. (2020). Blood from a stone: Performance of catch-only methods in estimating stock biomass status. Fisheries Research, 223, [105452]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105452
Free, Christopher M. ; Jensen, Olaf P. ; Anderson, Sean C. ; Gutierrez, Nicolas L. ; Kleisner, Kristin M. ; Longo, Catherine ; Minto, Cóilín ; Osio, Giacomo Chato ; Walsh, Jessica C. / Blood from a stone : Performance of catch-only methods in estimating stock biomass status. In: Fisheries Research. 2020 ; Vol. 223.
@article{0eb1fa55ba4d4009bd89e6a967853754,
title = "Blood from a stone: Performance of catch-only methods in estimating stock biomass status",
abstract = "Demand for data-limited stock assessment methods is increasing, and new methods are being developed rapidly. One class of these methods requires only catch time series and, in some cases, information about life history or fishery characteristics, to estimate stock status. These catch-only methods (COMs) range from statistical models trained on data-rich stocks to mechanistic population models that make assumptions about changes in fishing effort. We review 11 COMs, comparing performance through application to data-rich stocks and simulated fisheries. The catch-only methods evaluated here produce imprecise and biased estimates of B/BMSY, especially for stocks that are lightly exploited. They were also generally poor classifiers of stock status. While no method performed best across all stocks, ensembles of multiple COMs generally performed better than individual COMs. We advocate for testing new COMs using this common platform. We also caution that performance in estimating stock status is not sufficient for gauging the usefulness of COMs in managing fisheries. Greater use of management strategy evaluation is needed before COMs can be considered a reliable tool for management.",
keywords = "Catch-only methods, Data-limited fisheries, Data-poor fisheries, Ensemble methods, Stock assessment, Stock status",
author = "Free, {Christopher M.} and Jensen, {Olaf P.} and Anderson, {Sean C.} and Gutierrez, {Nicolas L.} and Kleisner, {Kristin M.} and Catherine Longo and C{\'o}il{\'i}n Minto and Osio, {Giacomo Chato} and Walsh, {Jessica C.}",
year = "2020",
month = "3",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105452",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "223",
journal = "Fisheries Research",
issn = "0165-7836",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Free, CM, Jensen, OP, Anderson, SC, Gutierrez, NL, Kleisner, KM, Longo, C, Minto, C, Osio, GC & Walsh, JC 2020, 'Blood from a stone: Performance of catch-only methods in estimating stock biomass status', Fisheries Research, vol. 223, 105452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105452

Blood from a stone : Performance of catch-only methods in estimating stock biomass status. / Free, Christopher M.; Jensen, Olaf P.; Anderson, Sean C.; Gutierrez, Nicolas L.; Kleisner, Kristin M.; Longo, Catherine; Minto, Cóilín; Osio, Giacomo Chato; Walsh, Jessica C.

In: Fisheries Research, Vol. 223, 105452, 03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blood from a stone

T2 - Performance of catch-only methods in estimating stock biomass status

AU - Free, Christopher M.

AU - Jensen, Olaf P.

AU - Anderson, Sean C.

AU - Gutierrez, Nicolas L.

AU - Kleisner, Kristin M.

AU - Longo, Catherine

AU - Minto, Cóilín

AU - Osio, Giacomo Chato

AU - Walsh, Jessica C.

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - Demand for data-limited stock assessment methods is increasing, and new methods are being developed rapidly. One class of these methods requires only catch time series and, in some cases, information about life history or fishery characteristics, to estimate stock status. These catch-only methods (COMs) range from statistical models trained on data-rich stocks to mechanistic population models that make assumptions about changes in fishing effort. We review 11 COMs, comparing performance through application to data-rich stocks and simulated fisheries. The catch-only methods evaluated here produce imprecise and biased estimates of B/BMSY, especially for stocks that are lightly exploited. They were also generally poor classifiers of stock status. While no method performed best across all stocks, ensembles of multiple COMs generally performed better than individual COMs. We advocate for testing new COMs using this common platform. We also caution that performance in estimating stock status is not sufficient for gauging the usefulness of COMs in managing fisheries. Greater use of management strategy evaluation is needed before COMs can be considered a reliable tool for management.

AB - Demand for data-limited stock assessment methods is increasing, and new methods are being developed rapidly. One class of these methods requires only catch time series and, in some cases, information about life history or fishery characteristics, to estimate stock status. These catch-only methods (COMs) range from statistical models trained on data-rich stocks to mechanistic population models that make assumptions about changes in fishing effort. We review 11 COMs, comparing performance through application to data-rich stocks and simulated fisheries. The catch-only methods evaluated here produce imprecise and biased estimates of B/BMSY, especially for stocks that are lightly exploited. They were also generally poor classifiers of stock status. While no method performed best across all stocks, ensembles of multiple COMs generally performed better than individual COMs. We advocate for testing new COMs using this common platform. We also caution that performance in estimating stock status is not sufficient for gauging the usefulness of COMs in managing fisheries. Greater use of management strategy evaluation is needed before COMs can be considered a reliable tool for management.

KW - Catch-only methods

KW - Data-limited fisheries

KW - Data-poor fisheries

KW - Ensemble methods

KW - Stock assessment

KW - Stock status

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075565364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075565364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105452

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105452

M3 - Article

VL - 223

JO - Fisheries Research

JF - Fisheries Research

SN - 0165-7836

M1 - 105452

ER -