Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups

Noam Miller, Simon Garnier, Andrew T. Hartnett, Iain D. Couzin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During consensus decision making, individuals in groups balance personal information (based on their own past experiences) with social information (based on the behavior of other individuals), allowing the group to reach a single collective choice. Previous studies of consensus decision making processes have focused on the informational aspects of behavioral choice, assuming that individuals make choices based solely on their likelihood of being beneficial (e.g., rewarded). However, decisions by both humans and nonhuman animals systematically violate such expectations. Furthermore, the typical experimental paradigm of assessing binary decisions, those between two mutually exclusive options, confounds two aspects commontomost group decisions: minimizing uncertainty (through the use of personal and social information) and maintaining group cohesion (for example, to reduce predation risk). Here we experimentally disassociate cohesion-based decisions from information-based decisions using a three-choice paradigm and demonstrate that both factors are crucial to understanding the collective decision making of schooling fish. In addition, we demonstrate how multiple informational dimensions (here color and stripe orientation) are integrated within groups to achieve consensus, even though no individual is explicitly aware of, or has a unique preference for, the consensus option. Balancing of personal information and social cues by individuals in key frontal positions in the group is shown to be essential for such group-level capabilities. Our results demonstrate the importance of integrating informational with other social considerations when explaining the collective capabilities of group-living animals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5263-5268
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume110
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 26 2013

Fingerprint

Consensus
Decision Making
Uncertainty
Cues
Fishes
Color

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Keywords

  • Bayesian
  • Behaviour
  • Collective intelligence
  • Golden shiner

Cite this

@article{528d202c4f554d299a0d01274073ef4b,
title = "Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups",
abstract = "During consensus decision making, individuals in groups balance personal information (based on their own past experiences) with social information (based on the behavior of other individuals), allowing the group to reach a single collective choice. Previous studies of consensus decision making processes have focused on the informational aspects of behavioral choice, assuming that individuals make choices based solely on their likelihood of being beneficial (e.g., rewarded). However, decisions by both humans and nonhuman animals systematically violate such expectations. Furthermore, the typical experimental paradigm of assessing binary decisions, those between two mutually exclusive options, confounds two aspects commontomost group decisions: minimizing uncertainty (through the use of personal and social information) and maintaining group cohesion (for example, to reduce predation risk). Here we experimentally disassociate cohesion-based decisions from information-based decisions using a three-choice paradigm and demonstrate that both factors are crucial to understanding the collective decision making of schooling fish. In addition, we demonstrate how multiple informational dimensions (here color and stripe orientation) are integrated within groups to achieve consensus, even though no individual is explicitly aware of, or has a unique preference for, the consensus option. Balancing of personal information and social cues by individuals in key frontal positions in the group is shown to be essential for such group-level capabilities. Our results demonstrate the importance of integrating informational with other social considerations when explaining the collective capabilities of group-living animals.",
keywords = "Bayesian, Behaviour, Collective intelligence, Golden shiner",
author = "Noam Miller and Simon Garnier and Hartnett, {Andrew T.} and Couzin, {Iain D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "26",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217513110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "5263--5268",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "13",

}

Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups. / Miller, Noam; Garnier, Simon; Hartnett, Andrew T.; Couzin, Iain D.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 110, No. 13, 26.03.2013, p. 5263-5268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups

AU - Miller, Noam

AU - Garnier, Simon

AU - Hartnett, Andrew T.

AU - Couzin, Iain D.

PY - 2013/3/26

Y1 - 2013/3/26

N2 - During consensus decision making, individuals in groups balance personal information (based on their own past experiences) with social information (based on the behavior of other individuals), allowing the group to reach a single collective choice. Previous studies of consensus decision making processes have focused on the informational aspects of behavioral choice, assuming that individuals make choices based solely on their likelihood of being beneficial (e.g., rewarded). However, decisions by both humans and nonhuman animals systematically violate such expectations. Furthermore, the typical experimental paradigm of assessing binary decisions, those between two mutually exclusive options, confounds two aspects commontomost group decisions: minimizing uncertainty (through the use of personal and social information) and maintaining group cohesion (for example, to reduce predation risk). Here we experimentally disassociate cohesion-based decisions from information-based decisions using a three-choice paradigm and demonstrate that both factors are crucial to understanding the collective decision making of schooling fish. In addition, we demonstrate how multiple informational dimensions (here color and stripe orientation) are integrated within groups to achieve consensus, even though no individual is explicitly aware of, or has a unique preference for, the consensus option. Balancing of personal information and social cues by individuals in key frontal positions in the group is shown to be essential for such group-level capabilities. Our results demonstrate the importance of integrating informational with other social considerations when explaining the collective capabilities of group-living animals.

AB - During consensus decision making, individuals in groups balance personal information (based on their own past experiences) with social information (based on the behavior of other individuals), allowing the group to reach a single collective choice. Previous studies of consensus decision making processes have focused on the informational aspects of behavioral choice, assuming that individuals make choices based solely on their likelihood of being beneficial (e.g., rewarded). However, decisions by both humans and nonhuman animals systematically violate such expectations. Furthermore, the typical experimental paradigm of assessing binary decisions, those between two mutually exclusive options, confounds two aspects commontomost group decisions: minimizing uncertainty (through the use of personal and social information) and maintaining group cohesion (for example, to reduce predation risk). Here we experimentally disassociate cohesion-based decisions from information-based decisions using a three-choice paradigm and demonstrate that both factors are crucial to understanding the collective decision making of schooling fish. In addition, we demonstrate how multiple informational dimensions (here color and stripe orientation) are integrated within groups to achieve consensus, even though no individual is explicitly aware of, or has a unique preference for, the consensus option. Balancing of personal information and social cues by individuals in key frontal positions in the group is shown to be essential for such group-level capabilities. Our results demonstrate the importance of integrating informational with other social considerations when explaining the collective capabilities of group-living animals.

KW - Bayesian

KW - Behaviour

KW - Collective intelligence

KW - Golden shiner

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875497767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875497767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217513110

DO - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217513110

M3 - Article

C2 - 23440218

VL - 110

SP - 5263

EP - 5268

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 13

ER -