Can a summer make a difference? The impact of the American Economic Association Summer Program on minority student outcomes

Charles M. Becker, Cecilia Elena Rouse, Mingyu Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the 1970s, the American Economic Association (AEA) was one of several professional associations to launch a summer program with the goal of increasing racial and ethnic diversity in its profession. In this paper we estimate the effectiveness of the AEA's program which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to rigorously study such a summer program. Using a comparison group consisting of those who applied to, but did not attend, the program and controlling for an array of background characteristics, we find that program participants were over 40 percentage points more likely to apply to and attend a Ph.D. program in economics, 26 percentage points more likely to complete a Ph.D., and about 15 percentage points more likely to ever work in an economics-related academic job. Using our estimates, we calculate that the program may directly account for 17–21 percent of the Ph.D.s awarded to minorities in economics over the past 20 years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-71
Number of pages26
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume53
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

minority
economics
student
professional association
Economics
Minorities
profession
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{dad1597b20a74b979e9729d8f4d2a27b,
title = "Can a summer make a difference? The impact of the American Economic Association Summer Program on minority student outcomes",
abstract = "In the 1970s, the American Economic Association (AEA) was one of several professional associations to launch a summer program with the goal of increasing racial and ethnic diversity in its profession. In this paper we estimate the effectiveness of the AEA's program which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to rigorously study such a summer program. Using a comparison group consisting of those who applied to, but did not attend, the program and controlling for an array of background characteristics, we find that program participants were over 40 percentage points more likely to apply to and attend a Ph.D. program in economics, 26 percentage points more likely to complete a Ph.D., and about 15 percentage points more likely to ever work in an economics-related academic job. Using our estimates, we calculate that the program may directly account for 17–21 percent of the Ph.D.s awarded to minorities in economics over the past 20 years.",
author = "Becker, {Charles M.} and Rouse, {Cecilia Elena} and Mingyu Chen",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "46--71",
journal = "Economics of Education Review",
issn = "0272-7757",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Can a summer make a difference? The impact of the American Economic Association Summer Program on minority student outcomes. / Becker, Charles M.; Rouse, Cecilia Elena; Chen, Mingyu.

In: Economics of Education Review, Vol. 53, 01.08.2016, p. 46-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can a summer make a difference? The impact of the American Economic Association Summer Program on minority student outcomes

AU - Becker, Charles M.

AU - Rouse, Cecilia Elena

AU - Chen, Mingyu

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - In the 1970s, the American Economic Association (AEA) was one of several professional associations to launch a summer program with the goal of increasing racial and ethnic diversity in its profession. In this paper we estimate the effectiveness of the AEA's program which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to rigorously study such a summer program. Using a comparison group consisting of those who applied to, but did not attend, the program and controlling for an array of background characteristics, we find that program participants were over 40 percentage points more likely to apply to and attend a Ph.D. program in economics, 26 percentage points more likely to complete a Ph.D., and about 15 percentage points more likely to ever work in an economics-related academic job. Using our estimates, we calculate that the program may directly account for 17–21 percent of the Ph.D.s awarded to minorities in economics over the past 20 years.

AB - In the 1970s, the American Economic Association (AEA) was one of several professional associations to launch a summer program with the goal of increasing racial and ethnic diversity in its profession. In this paper we estimate the effectiveness of the AEA's program which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to rigorously study such a summer program. Using a comparison group consisting of those who applied to, but did not attend, the program and controlling for an array of background characteristics, we find that program participants were over 40 percentage points more likely to apply to and attend a Ph.D. program in economics, 26 percentage points more likely to complete a Ph.D., and about 15 percentage points more likely to ever work in an economics-related academic job. Using our estimates, we calculate that the program may directly account for 17–21 percent of the Ph.D.s awarded to minorities in economics over the past 20 years.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989897586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989897586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.009

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.009

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 46

EP - 71

JO - Economics of Education Review

JF - Economics of Education Review

SN - 0272-7757

ER -