Can There Be a Feminist Rational Choice Institutionalism?

Amanda Driscoll, Mona Lena Krook

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gender and politics scholars have long recognized the importance of political institutions (Lovenduski 1998). Most of this work focuses on formal institutions (Chappell 2006; Kenney 1996), but several studies discuss gendered practices and norms in ways that can be seen as consistent with definitions of informal institutions (Duerst-Lahti and Kelly 1995; Kenny 2007). Despite these shared concerns, few feminists frame their research in relation to institutionalism. To the degree that they do, they tend to view the most promising point of intersections to be with historical, sociological, and discursive versions. In contrast, they seem more wary of rational choice, arguing that this brand of institutionalism is unhelpful to, if not fundamentally incompatible with, the objectives of feminist research (cf. Kenny and Paantjens 2006).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)238-245
Number of pages8
JournalPolitics and Gender
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can There Be a Feminist Rational Choice Institutionalism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this