Can We Engage Students in Authentic Mathematical Activity While Embracing Critical Pedagogy? A Commentary on the Tensions Between Disciplinary Activity and Critical Education

Keith Weber, Kathleen Melhuish

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In this commentary, we explore tensions between engaging students in authentic disciplinary mathematical activity and insights from critical theorists who analyze equity in mathematics education. The tensions arise as engaging students in authentic mathematical activity usually involve having students adopt the language and norms of another community. We suggest these tensions can be mitigated (but not eliminated) by (i) focusing on expanding students’ authentic mathematical practices while giving less concern towards eliminating inauthentic mathematical practices, (ii) not restricting authentic mathematical activity to the creation of new mathematics, and (iii) including activities that allow students to make mathematics personal.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)305-314
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Keywords

  • Critical mathematics
  • Critical pedagogy
  • Math equity
  • Mathematics education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can We Engage Students in Authentic Mathematical Activity While Embracing Critical Pedagogy? A Commentary on the Tensions Between Disciplinary Activity and Critical Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this