Comparison of confirmation measures

Katya Tentori; Vincenzo Crupi; Nicolao Bonini; Daniel Osherson

doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.006

Comparison of confirmation measures

Katya Tentori
, Vincenzo Crupi
, Nicolao Bonini
, Daniel Osherson

Psychology

Princeton University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Alternative measures of confirmation or evidential support have been proposed to express the impact of ascertaining one event on the credibility of another. We report an experiment that compares the adequacy of several such measures as descriptions of confirmation judgment in a probabilistic context.

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	107-119
Number of pages	13
Journal	Cognition
Volume	103
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.006
State	Published - Apr 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Cognitive Neuroscience
Language and Linguistics
Linguistics and Language

Keywords

Bayesian confirmation measures
Belief updating
Evidential support
Inductive reasoning

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.006

Cite this

@article{0e2baff5a65e45428591e39da5c3a5be,

title = "Comparison of confirmation measures",

abstract = "Alternative measures of confirmation or evidential support have been proposed to express the impact of ascertaining one event on the credibility of another. We report an experiment that compares the adequacy of several such measures as descriptions of confirmation judgment in a probabilistic context.",

keywords = "Bayesian confirmation measures, Belief updating, Evidential support, Inductive reasoning",

author = "Katya Tentori and Vincenzo Crupi and Nicolao Bonini and Daniel Osherson",

note = "Funding Information: We thank Branden Fitelson, Douglas Medin, Lance Rips, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft. This work was supported in part by a FIRB-MIUR grant awarded to the third author.",

year = "2007",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.006",

language = "American English",

volume = "103",

pages = "107--119",

journal = "Cognition",

issn = "0010-0277",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of confirmation measures

AU - Tentori, Katya

AU - Crupi, Vincenzo

AU - Bonini, Nicolao

AU - Osherson, Daniel

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Branden Fitelson, Douglas Medin, Lance Rips, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft. This work was supported in part by a FIRB-MIUR grant awarded to the third author.

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Alternative measures of confirmation or evidential support have been proposed to express the impact of ascertaining one event on the credibility of another. We report an experiment that compares the adequacy of several such measures as descriptions of confirmation judgment in a probabilistic context.

AB - Alternative measures of confirmation or evidential support have been proposed to express the impact of ascertaining one event on the credibility of another. We report an experiment that compares the adequacy of several such measures as descriptions of confirmation judgment in a probabilistic context.

KW - Bayesian confirmation measures

KW - Belief updating

KW - Evidential support

KW - Inductive reasoning

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33846866525

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33846866525#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 16678146

SN - 0010-0277

VL - 103

SP - 107

EP - 119

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

IS - 1

ER -

Comparison of confirmation measures

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this