Comparison of methods for monitoring bacterial transport in the subsurface

Mary F. DeFlaun, Mark E. Fuller, Pengfei Zhang, William P. Johnson, Brian J. Mailloux, William E. Holben, William P. Kovacik, David L. Balkwill, Tullis C. Onstott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare in a laboratory experiment, a suite of methods developed to track viable bacteria during field transport experiments. The criteria for development and selection of these methods included: (1) the ability to track bacteria within the environment from which they were isolated; (2) the lack of any effect upon the viability or the transport characteristics of the strain; (3) low detection limits; (4) a quantification range that covered several orders of magnitude; and (5) an analytical cost and turnover time commensurate with the analysis of several thousands of samples in a few months. The approaches developed included: enumeration of bacteria labeled with a vital fluorescent stain (CFDA/SE) using microplate spectrofluorometry, flow cytometry, and ferrographic (immunomagnetic) capture; enumeration of highly 13C-enriched bacteria using combustion-IRMS; and quantitative PCR. These methods were compared to direct microscopic enumeration and plate counts during a bacterial transport experiment performed in an intact sediment core and designed to simulate the field experiment. Four of the seven methods had equivalent recoveries for the breakthrough of a pulse of bacteria eluting from a 50-cm long sediment core, and all of the methods detected the arrival of cells in the effluent prior to the conservative tracer. Combustion IRMS and ferrographic enumeration had the lowest quantification limits (∼ 2 to 20 cells/ml), whereas microplate spectrofluorometry had the highest quantification limit (∼ 105 cells/ml). These methods have the potential for numerous applications beyond tracking bacteria injected into the subsurface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-231
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Microbiological Methods
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Bacteria
Fluorescence Spectrometry
Patient Selection
Limit of Detection
Flow Cytometry
Coloring Agents
Costs and Cost Analysis
Polymerase Chain Reaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Molecular Biology
  • Microbiology

Cite this

DeFlaun, M. F., Fuller, M. E., Zhang, P., Johnson, W. P., Mailloux, B. J., Holben, W. E., ... Onstott, T. C. (2001). Comparison of methods for monitoring bacterial transport in the subsurface. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 47(2), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00307-4
DeFlaun, Mary F. ; Fuller, Mark E. ; Zhang, Pengfei ; Johnson, William P. ; Mailloux, Brian J. ; Holben, William E. ; Kovacik, William P. ; Balkwill, David L. ; Onstott, Tullis C. / Comparison of methods for monitoring bacterial transport in the subsurface. In: Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2001 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 219-231.
@article{a4147266c5874270ba1e332e06c75c80,
title = "Comparison of methods for monitoring bacterial transport in the subsurface",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare in a laboratory experiment, a suite of methods developed to track viable bacteria during field transport experiments. The criteria for development and selection of these methods included: (1) the ability to track bacteria within the environment from which they were isolated; (2) the lack of any effect upon the viability or the transport characteristics of the strain; (3) low detection limits; (4) a quantification range that covered several orders of magnitude; and (5) an analytical cost and turnover time commensurate with the analysis of several thousands of samples in a few months. The approaches developed included: enumeration of bacteria labeled with a vital fluorescent stain (CFDA/SE) using microplate spectrofluorometry, flow cytometry, and ferrographic (immunomagnetic) capture; enumeration of highly 13C-enriched bacteria using combustion-IRMS; and quantitative PCR. These methods were compared to direct microscopic enumeration and plate counts during a bacterial transport experiment performed in an intact sediment core and designed to simulate the field experiment. Four of the seven methods had equivalent recoveries for the breakthrough of a pulse of bacteria eluting from a 50-cm long sediment core, and all of the methods detected the arrival of cells in the effluent prior to the conservative tracer. Combustion IRMS and ferrographic enumeration had the lowest quantification limits (∼ 2 to 20 cells/ml), whereas microplate spectrofluorometry had the highest quantification limit (∼ 105 cells/ml). These methods have the potential for numerous applications beyond tracking bacteria injected into the subsurface.",
author = "DeFlaun, {Mary F.} and Fuller, {Mark E.} and Pengfei Zhang and Johnson, {William P.} and Mailloux, {Brian J.} and Holben, {William E.} and Kovacik, {William P.} and Balkwill, {David L.} and Onstott, {Tullis C.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00307-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "219--231",
journal = "Journal of Microbiological Methods",
issn = "0167-7012",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

DeFlaun, MF, Fuller, ME, Zhang, P, Johnson, WP, Mailloux, BJ, Holben, WE, Kovacik, WP, Balkwill, DL & Onstott, TC 2001, 'Comparison of methods for monitoring bacterial transport in the subsurface', Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00307-4

Comparison of methods for monitoring bacterial transport in the subsurface. / DeFlaun, Mary F.; Fuller, Mark E.; Zhang, Pengfei; Johnson, William P.; Mailloux, Brian J.; Holben, William E.; Kovacik, William P.; Balkwill, David L.; Onstott, Tullis C.

In: Journal of Microbiological Methods, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.01.2001, p. 219-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of methods for monitoring bacterial transport in the subsurface

AU - DeFlaun, Mary F.

AU - Fuller, Mark E.

AU - Zhang, Pengfei

AU - Johnson, William P.

AU - Mailloux, Brian J.

AU - Holben, William E.

AU - Kovacik, William P.

AU - Balkwill, David L.

AU - Onstott, Tullis C.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare in a laboratory experiment, a suite of methods developed to track viable bacteria during field transport experiments. The criteria for development and selection of these methods included: (1) the ability to track bacteria within the environment from which they were isolated; (2) the lack of any effect upon the viability or the transport characteristics of the strain; (3) low detection limits; (4) a quantification range that covered several orders of magnitude; and (5) an analytical cost and turnover time commensurate with the analysis of several thousands of samples in a few months. The approaches developed included: enumeration of bacteria labeled with a vital fluorescent stain (CFDA/SE) using microplate spectrofluorometry, flow cytometry, and ferrographic (immunomagnetic) capture; enumeration of highly 13C-enriched bacteria using combustion-IRMS; and quantitative PCR. These methods were compared to direct microscopic enumeration and plate counts during a bacterial transport experiment performed in an intact sediment core and designed to simulate the field experiment. Four of the seven methods had equivalent recoveries for the breakthrough of a pulse of bacteria eluting from a 50-cm long sediment core, and all of the methods detected the arrival of cells in the effluent prior to the conservative tracer. Combustion IRMS and ferrographic enumeration had the lowest quantification limits (∼ 2 to 20 cells/ml), whereas microplate spectrofluorometry had the highest quantification limit (∼ 105 cells/ml). These methods have the potential for numerous applications beyond tracking bacteria injected into the subsurface.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare in a laboratory experiment, a suite of methods developed to track viable bacteria during field transport experiments. The criteria for development and selection of these methods included: (1) the ability to track bacteria within the environment from which they were isolated; (2) the lack of any effect upon the viability or the transport characteristics of the strain; (3) low detection limits; (4) a quantification range that covered several orders of magnitude; and (5) an analytical cost and turnover time commensurate with the analysis of several thousands of samples in a few months. The approaches developed included: enumeration of bacteria labeled with a vital fluorescent stain (CFDA/SE) using microplate spectrofluorometry, flow cytometry, and ferrographic (immunomagnetic) capture; enumeration of highly 13C-enriched bacteria using combustion-IRMS; and quantitative PCR. These methods were compared to direct microscopic enumeration and plate counts during a bacterial transport experiment performed in an intact sediment core and designed to simulate the field experiment. Four of the seven methods had equivalent recoveries for the breakthrough of a pulse of bacteria eluting from a 50-cm long sediment core, and all of the methods detected the arrival of cells in the effluent prior to the conservative tracer. Combustion IRMS and ferrographic enumeration had the lowest quantification limits (∼ 2 to 20 cells/ml), whereas microplate spectrofluorometry had the highest quantification limit (∼ 105 cells/ml). These methods have the potential for numerous applications beyond tracking bacteria injected into the subsurface.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034802771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034802771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00307-4

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00307-4

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 219

EP - 231

JO - Journal of Microbiological Methods

JF - Journal of Microbiological Methods

SN - 0167-7012

IS - 2

ER -

DeFlaun MF, Fuller ME, Zhang P, Johnson WP, Mailloux BJ, Holben WE et al. Comparison of methods for monitoring bacterial transport in the subsurface. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2001 Jan 1;47(2):219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00307-4