Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005)

Paweł Łajczak; Sherif Eltawansy; Ogechukwu Obi; Oguz Kagan Sahin; Ayesha Ayesha; Jesus Almendral; Jeffrey Selan; Renato Apolito; Ahmad Elashery; Anna Łajczak; Stanisław Buczkowski; Kamil Jóźwik; Przemysław Nowakowski; Julita Janiec; Krzysztof Żerdziński; Michele Schincariol

doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007

Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005)

Paweł Łajczak
, Sherif Eltawansy
, Ogechukwu Obi
, Oguz Kagan Sahin
, Ayesha Ayesha
, Jesus Almendral
, Jeffrey Selan
, Renato Apolito
, Ahmad Elashery
, Anna Łajczak
, Stanisław Buczkowski
, Kamil Jóźwik
, Przemysław Nowakowski
, Julita Janiec
, Krzysztof Żerdziński
, Michele Schincariol

School of Medicine

Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret that in the originally published version of this article, the Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Writing Process was inadvertently omitted. This oversight has now been corrected, and the declaration has been included. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. During the preparation of this work, the authors used Gemini (Google Inc.) during writing, translating, and grammar checking process. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article. A large language model was not used for data extraction, screening, or statistical analysis. All ideas, analysis, and final content were produced and approved by the authors.

Original language	English
Journal	Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007
State	Accepted/In press - 2026

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Access to Document

10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Łajczak, P., Eltawansy, S., Obi, O., Sahin, O. K., Ayesha, A., Almendral, J., Selan, J., Apolito, R., Elashery, A., Łajczak, A., Buczkowski, S., Jóźwik, K., Nowakowski, P., Janiec, J., Żerdziński, K., & Schincariol, M. (Accepted/In press). Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005). Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007

Łajczak, Paweł ; Eltawansy, Sherif ; Obi, Ogechukwu et al. / Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate : Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005). In: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2026.

@article{a7bcb7f16bc94e25880238c751128c2c,

title = "Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005)",

abstract = "The authors regret that in the originally published version of this article, the Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Writing Process was inadvertently omitted. This oversight has now been corrected, and the declaration has been included. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. During the preparation of this work, the authors used Gemini (Google Inc.) during writing, translating, and grammar checking process. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article. A large language model was not used for data extraction, screening, or statistical analysis. All ideas, analysis, and final content were produced and approved by the authors.",

author = "Pawe{\l} {\L}ajczak and Sherif Eltawansy and Ogechukwu Obi and Sahin, \{Oguz Kagan\} and Ayesha Ayesha and Jesus Almendral and Jeffrey Selan and Renato Apolito and Ahmad Elashery and Anna {\L}ajczak and Stanis{\l}aw Buczkowski and Kamil J{\'o}{\'z}wik and Przemys{\l}aw Nowakowski and Julita Janiec and Krzysztof {\.Z}erdzi{\'n}ski and Michele Schincariol",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2026 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2026",

doi = "10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007",

language = "English",

journal = "Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine",

issn = "1553-8389",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Łajczak, P, Eltawansy, S, Obi, O, Sahin, OK, Ayesha, A, Almendral, J, Selan, J, Apolito, R, Elashery, A, Łajczak, A, Buczkowski, S, Jóźwik, K, Nowakowski, P, Janiec, J, Żerdziński, K & Schincariol, M 2026, 'Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005)', Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007

Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005). / Łajczak, Paweł; Eltawansy, Sherif; Obi, Ogechukwu et al.
In: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 2026.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate

T2 - Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005)

AU - Łajczak, Paweł

AU - Eltawansy, Sherif

AU - Obi, Ogechukwu

AU - Sahin, Oguz Kagan

AU - Ayesha, Ayesha

AU - Almendral, Jesus

AU - Selan, Jeffrey

AU - Apolito, Renato

AU - Elashery, Ahmad

AU - Łajczak, Anna

AU - Buczkowski, Stanisław

AU - Jóźwik, Kamil

AU - Nowakowski, Przemysław

AU - Janiec, Julita

AU - Żerdziński, Krzysztof

AU - Schincariol, Michele

PY - 2026

Y1 - 2026

N2 - The authors regret that in the originally published version of this article, the Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Writing Process was inadvertently omitted. This oversight has now been corrected, and the declaration has been included. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. During the preparation of this work, the authors used Gemini (Google Inc.) during writing, translating, and grammar checking process. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article. A large language model was not used for data extraction, screening, or statistical analysis. All ideas, analysis, and final content were produced and approved by the authors.

AB - The authors regret that in the originally published version of this article, the Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted Technologies in the Writing Process was inadvertently omitted. This oversight has now been corrected, and the declaration has been included. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. During the preparation of this work, the authors used Gemini (Google Inc.) during writing, translating, and grammar checking process. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article. A large language model was not used for data extraction, screening, or statistical analysis. All ideas, analysis, and final content were produced and approved by the authors.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105033049862

U2 - 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 1553-8389

JO - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

JF - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

ER -

Łajczak P, Eltawansy S, Obi O, Sahin OK, Ayesha A, Almendral J et al. Corrigendum to “Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention and the clinical effectiveness debate: Is newer always better? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis” (Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, (2025), 76, C, (113-120), (S1553838925001563), 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.04.005). Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2026.03.007

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this