Corrigendum to: State prekindergarten effects on early learning at kindergarten entry: An analysis of eight state programs (AERA Open, 4, 2, 10.1177/2332858418766291)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to

T2 - State prekindergarten effects on early learning at kindergarten entry: An analysis of eight state programs (AERA Open, 4, 2, 10.1177/2332858418766291)

AU - Barnett, W. S.

AU - Jung, K.

AU - Friedman-Krauss, A.

AU - Frede, E. C.

AU - Nores, M.

AU - Hustedt, J. T.

AU - Daniel-Echols, M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018, SAGE Publications Inc.. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - In this article, New Mexico’s program (in 2008) was incorrectly classified as means tested in the first 3 sentences in the State Program Descriptions section on page 3 and in the associated Table 1 on page 4. The corrected text and Table 1 are provided below: Salient features of each state’s program are reported in Table 1 for the year in which data were collected. Programs ina Arkansas, California, Michigan, and South Carolina were means tested, while programs in Oklahoma and West Virginia were open to all children. New Mexico set no means-test for individual eligibility, but two-thirds of enrolled children at each site were required to live in the attendance zone of a Title I elementary school. New Jersey’s program was open to all children living in 31 relatively high-poverty school districts. New Mexico’s program required that all programs served 4-year-olds and most served some 3-year-olds, but only New Jersey’s program had most children enter at age 3.

AB - In this article, New Mexico’s program (in 2008) was incorrectly classified as means tested in the first 3 sentences in the State Program Descriptions section on page 3 and in the associated Table 1 on page 4. The corrected text and Table 1 are provided below: Salient features of each state’s program are reported in Table 1 for the year in which data were collected. Programs ina Arkansas, California, Michigan, and South Carolina were means tested, while programs in Oklahoma and West Virginia were open to all children. New Mexico set no means-test for individual eligibility, but two-thirds of enrolled children at each site were required to live in the attendance zone of a Title I elementary school. New Jersey’s program was open to all children living in 31 relatively high-poverty school districts. New Mexico’s program required that all programs served 4-year-olds and most served some 3-year-olds, but only New Jersey’s program had most children enter at age 3.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131102376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131102376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2332858418815914

DO - 10.1177/2332858418815914

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 2332-8584

VL - 4

JO - AERA Open

JF - AERA Open

IS - 4

ER -