Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and institutional practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we focus on the activities done by the recipients of crying. In the analysis, we work with a corpus of calls from a child protection helpline in which the caller shows features of crying (14 calls, or about 10% of the total). Our focus is on two kinds of crying receipts made by child protection officers (CPOs) that are rare in noncrying calls but recurrent in crying calls: take-your-times (TYTs) and empathie receipts (ERs). TYTs are used in environments in which the caller displays an attempt to but failure to articulate talk. This can be shown by inappropriate silence, wet sniffs, sobs, and turn constructional units that are either incomplete or disrupted by sobs, sniffs, or whispering. TYTs offer a license for the late delivery of talk and are affiliative. ERs can replace TYTs but are more common in environments in which callers are unresponsive to CPO actions such as advice giving. ERs have two elements - a formulation of the crying party's mental state and some sort of marker of the contingency of the mental state formulations. The mental state element is built from local features of the caller's talk (displays and metaformulations of upset), and issues of accuracy are managed through the epistemic contingency maker (most often treating the formulation as based on hearing). We discuss broader implications of this work for conceptions of empathy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-116
Number of pages28
JournalResearch on Language and Social Interaction
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Institutional Practice
Crying
empathy
child protection
Display devices
Audition
contingency
license
Licensure
recipient
Hearing
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Social Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{945e8b7bc5024593a08c10213f009278,
title = "Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and institutional practice",
abstract = "In this article, we focus on the activities done by the recipients of crying. In the analysis, we work with a corpus of calls from a child protection helpline in which the caller shows features of crying (14 calls, or about 10{\%} of the total). Our focus is on two kinds of crying receipts made by child protection officers (CPOs) that are rare in noncrying calls but recurrent in crying calls: take-your-times (TYTs) and empathie receipts (ERs). TYTs are used in environments in which the caller displays an attempt to but failure to articulate talk. This can be shown by inappropriate silence, wet sniffs, sobs, and turn constructional units that are either incomplete or disrupted by sobs, sniffs, or whispering. TYTs offer a license for the late delivery of talk and are affiliative. ERs can replace TYTs but are more common in environments in which callers are unresponsive to CPO actions such as advice giving. ERs have two elements - a formulation of the crying party's mental state and some sort of marker of the contingency of the mental state formulations. The mental state element is built from local features of the caller's talk (displays and metaformulations of upset), and issues of accuracy are managed through the epistemic contingency maker (most often treating the formulation as based on hearing). We discuss broader implications of this work for conceptions of empathy.",
author = "Alexa Hepburn and Jonathan Potter",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701331299",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "89--116",
journal = "Research on Language and Social Interaction",
issn = "0835-1813",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Crying receipts : Time, empathy, and institutional practice. / Hepburn, Alexa; Potter, Jonathan.

In: Research on Language and Social Interaction, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 89-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crying receipts

T2 - Time, empathy, and institutional practice

AU - Hepburn, Alexa

AU - Potter, Jonathan

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - In this article, we focus on the activities done by the recipients of crying. In the analysis, we work with a corpus of calls from a child protection helpline in which the caller shows features of crying (14 calls, or about 10% of the total). Our focus is on two kinds of crying receipts made by child protection officers (CPOs) that are rare in noncrying calls but recurrent in crying calls: take-your-times (TYTs) and empathie receipts (ERs). TYTs are used in environments in which the caller displays an attempt to but failure to articulate talk. This can be shown by inappropriate silence, wet sniffs, sobs, and turn constructional units that are either incomplete or disrupted by sobs, sniffs, or whispering. TYTs offer a license for the late delivery of talk and are affiliative. ERs can replace TYTs but are more common in environments in which callers are unresponsive to CPO actions such as advice giving. ERs have two elements - a formulation of the crying party's mental state and some sort of marker of the contingency of the mental state formulations. The mental state element is built from local features of the caller's talk (displays and metaformulations of upset), and issues of accuracy are managed through the epistemic contingency maker (most often treating the formulation as based on hearing). We discuss broader implications of this work for conceptions of empathy.

AB - In this article, we focus on the activities done by the recipients of crying. In the analysis, we work with a corpus of calls from a child protection helpline in which the caller shows features of crying (14 calls, or about 10% of the total). Our focus is on two kinds of crying receipts made by child protection officers (CPOs) that are rare in noncrying calls but recurrent in crying calls: take-your-times (TYTs) and empathie receipts (ERs). TYTs are used in environments in which the caller displays an attempt to but failure to articulate talk. This can be shown by inappropriate silence, wet sniffs, sobs, and turn constructional units that are either incomplete or disrupted by sobs, sniffs, or whispering. TYTs offer a license for the late delivery of talk and are affiliative. ERs can replace TYTs but are more common in environments in which callers are unresponsive to CPO actions such as advice giving. ERs have two elements - a formulation of the crying party's mental state and some sort of marker of the contingency of the mental state formulations. The mental state element is built from local features of the caller's talk (displays and metaformulations of upset), and issues of accuracy are managed through the epistemic contingency maker (most often treating the formulation as based on hearing). We discuss broader implications of this work for conceptions of empathy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249934311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249934311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701331299

DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701331299

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 89

EP - 116

JO - Research on Language and Social Interaction

JF - Research on Language and Social Interaction

SN - 0835-1813

IS - 1

ER -