TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan
T2 - Results from the geriatric research gap Delphi survey
AU - Joseph, Bellal
AU - Saljuqi, Abdul Tawab
AU - Phuong, Jimmy
AU - Shipper, Edward
AU - Braverman, Maxwell A.
AU - Bixby, Pamela J.
AU - Price, Michelle A.
AU - Barraco, Robert D.
AU - Cooper, Zara
AU - Jarman, Molly
AU - Lack, William
AU - Lueckel, Stephanie
AU - Pivalizza, Evan
AU - Bulger, Eileen
AU - Adams, Sasha
AU - Arbabi, Sam
AU - Barraco, Robert D.
AU - Cooper, Zara
AU - Cryer, Henry
AU - Ditillo, Michael
AU - Dutton, Richard P.
AU - Fain, Mindy J.
AU - Haines, Krista Lynn
AU - Ho, Vanessa
AU - Ingraham, Angela M.
AU - Jarman, Molly
AU - Lack, William
AU - Lueckel, Stephanie
AU - Maxwell, Cathy A.
AU - Mosenthal, Anne
AU - Mujahid, Nadia
AU - O'Connell, Kathleen M.
AU - Pivalizza, Evan
AU - Priest, Stephanie
AU - Szatkowski, Jan P.
AU - Vrahas, Mark S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - BACKGROUND Treating older trauma patients requires a focus on the confluence of age-related physiological changes and the impact of the injury itself. Therefore, the primary way to improve the care of geriatric trauma patients is through the development of universal, systematic multidisciplinary research. To achieve this, the Coalition for National Trauma Research has developed the National Trauma Research Action Plan that has generated a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of geriatric trauma care from prehospital to rehabilitation. METHODS Experts in geriatric trauma care and research were recruited to identify current gaps in clinical geriatric research, generate research questions, and establish the priority of these questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. Participants were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines ensuring heterogeneity and generalizability. On subsequent surveys, participants were asked to rank the priority of each research question on a nine-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. The consensus was defined as more than 60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS A total of 24 subject matter experts generated questions in 109 key topic areas. After editing for duplication, 514 questions were included in the priority ranking. By round 3, 362 questions (70%) reached 60% consensus. Of these, 161 (44%) were high, 198 (55%) medium, and 3 (1%) low priority. CONCLUSION Among the questions prioritized as high priority, questions related to three types of injuries (i.e., rib fracture, traumatic brain injury, and lower extremity injury) occurred with the greatest frequency. Among the 25 highest priority questions, the key topics with the highest frequency were pain management, frailty, and anticoagulation-related interventions. The most common types of research proposed were interventional clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies, outcome research, and health care systems research.
AB - BACKGROUND Treating older trauma patients requires a focus on the confluence of age-related physiological changes and the impact of the injury itself. Therefore, the primary way to improve the care of geriatric trauma patients is through the development of universal, systematic multidisciplinary research. To achieve this, the Coalition for National Trauma Research has developed the National Trauma Research Action Plan that has generated a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of geriatric trauma care from prehospital to rehabilitation. METHODS Experts in geriatric trauma care and research were recruited to identify current gaps in clinical geriatric research, generate research questions, and establish the priority of these questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. Participants were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines ensuring heterogeneity and generalizability. On subsequent surveys, participants were asked to rank the priority of each research question on a nine-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. The consensus was defined as more than 60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS A total of 24 subject matter experts generated questions in 109 key topic areas. After editing for duplication, 514 questions were included in the priority ranking. By round 3, 362 questions (70%) reached 60% consensus. Of these, 161 (44%) were high, 198 (55%) medium, and 3 (1%) low priority. CONCLUSION Among the questions prioritized as high priority, questions related to three types of injuries (i.e., rib fracture, traumatic brain injury, and lower extremity injury) occurred with the greatest frequency. Among the 25 highest priority questions, the key topics with the highest frequency were pain management, frailty, and anticoagulation-related interventions. The most common types of research proposed were interventional clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies, outcome research, and health care systems research.
KW - Delphi survey
KW - Geriatric trauma
KW - older adults
KW - research agenda
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135383843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135383843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000003626
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000003626
M3 - Article
C2 - 35393380
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 93
SP - 209
EP - 219
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 2
ER -