Differential effects of language proficiency and use on L2 lexical prediction

Laura Fernández-Arroyo, Nuria Sagarra, Kaylee Fernández

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Language experience is essential for SLA. Yet, studies comparing the role of L2 proficiency and L2 use on L2 processing are scant, and there are no studies examining how these variables modulate learners' ability to generalize grammatical associations to new instances. This study investigates whether L2 proficiency and L2 use affect L2 stress-tense suffix associations (a stressed syllable cuing a present suffix, and an unstressed syllable cuing a preterit suffix) using eye-tracking. Spanish monolinguals and English learners of Spanish varying in L2 proficiency and L2 use saw two verbs (e.g., firma-firmó '(s)he signs/signed'), heard a sentence containing one of the verbs, and chose the verb they had heard. Both groups looked at target verbs above chance before hearing the suffix, but the monolinguals did so more accurately and earlier than the learners. The learners recognized past verbs faster than present verbs, were faster with higher than lower L2 proficiency, and later with higher than lower L2 use. Finally, higher L2 proficiency yielded earlier morphological activation but higher L2 use produced later morphological activation, indicating that L2 proficiency and L2 use affect L2 word processing differently. We discuss the contribution of these findings to language acquisition and processing models, as well as models of general cognition.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)213-238
Number of pages26
JournalMental Lexicon
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Keywords

  • language experience
  • lexical stress
  • morphology
  • proficiency
  • use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential effects of language proficiency and use on L2 lexical prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this