Abstract
Understanding of decentralized institutions has been hampered by a lack of longitudinal research on their formation and function. We conduct a 21-year panel analysis of conditions in the chemical industry before and after the emergence of a decentralized institution. We find that a critical event created a potentially damaging industry commons, and we find evidence that a newly formed self-regulatory institution reduced the risks associated with this commons. Surprisingly, however, we find that the institution accomplished this role not by protecting member organizations from the acts of other firms, but by protecting the entire industry from the acts of member firms. Thus, our findings support a functionalist view of institution formation, where that function is to parcel the reputation of individual firms from that shared with their rivals. Our findings also suggest that additional longitudinal empirical studies are essential to uncovering the underlying functions of decentralized institutions.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 66th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2006 - Atlanta, GA, United States Duration: Aug 11 2006 → Aug 16 2006 |
Conference
Conference | 66th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2006 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Atlanta, GA |
Period | 8/11/06 → 8/16/06 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management Information Systems
- Management of Technology and Innovation
Keywords
- Functionalist perspectivee
- Industry self-regulation
- Reputation commons