Guidance for Schools Selecting Antibullying Approaches: Translating Evidence-Based Strategies to Contemporary Implementation Realities

Nadia S. Ansary; Maurice J. Elias; Michael B. Greene; Stuart Green

doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14567534

Guidance for Schools Selecting Antibullying Approaches: Translating Evidence-Based Strategies to Contemporary Implementation Realities

Nadia S. Ansary, Maurice J. Elias, Michael B. Greene, Stuart Green

School of Arts and Sciences, Psychology

Rutgers, The State University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article synthesizes the current research on bullying prevention and intervention in order to provide guidance to schools seeking to select and implement antibullying strategies. Evidence-based best practices that are shared across generally effective antibullying approaches are elucidated, and these strategies are grounded in examples garnered from model antibullying programs as implemented in contemporary schools. Future directions for practice, research, and policy are also explicated.

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	27-36
Number of pages	10
Journal	Educational Researcher
Volume	44
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14567534
State	Published - Jan 17 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Education

Keywords

bullying prevention
educational policy
educational reform
evaluation
evidence-based best practices
harassment, intimidation, and bullying (HIB)
psychology
research methodology

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14567534

Cite this

@article{e7d49c8e212745aa835e3073c172cd12,

title = "Guidance for Schools Selecting Antibullying Approaches: Translating Evidence-Based Strategies to Contemporary Implementation Realities",

abstract = "This article synthesizes the current research on bullying prevention and intervention in order to provide guidance to schools seeking to select and implement antibullying strategies. Evidence-based best practices that are shared across generally effective antibullying approaches are elucidated, and these strategies are grounded in examples garnered from model antibullying programs as implemented in contemporary schools. Future directions for practice, research, and policy are also explicated.",

keywords = "bullying prevention, educational policy, educational reform, evaluation, evidence-based best practices, harassment, intimidation, and bullying (HIB), psychology, research methodology",

author = "Ansary, {Nadia S.} and Elias, {Maurice J.} and Greene, {Michael B.} and Stuart Green",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 AERA.",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

day = "17",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14567534",

language = "American English",

volume = "44",

pages = "27--36",

journal = "Educational Researcher",

issn = "0013-189X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidance for Schools Selecting Antibullying Approaches

T2 - Translating Evidence-Based Strategies to Contemporary Implementation Realities

AU - Ansary, Nadia S.

AU - Elias, Maurice J.

AU - Greene, Michael B.

AU - Green, Stuart

PY - 2015/1/17

Y1 - 2015/1/17

N2 - This article synthesizes the current research on bullying prevention and intervention in order to provide guidance to schools seeking to select and implement antibullying strategies. Evidence-based best practices that are shared across generally effective antibullying approaches are elucidated, and these strategies are grounded in examples garnered from model antibullying programs as implemented in contemporary schools. Future directions for practice, research, and policy are also explicated.

AB - This article synthesizes the current research on bullying prevention and intervention in order to provide guidance to schools seeking to select and implement antibullying strategies. Evidence-based best practices that are shared across generally effective antibullying approaches are elucidated, and these strategies are grounded in examples garnered from model antibullying programs as implemented in contemporary schools. Future directions for practice, research, and policy are also explicated.

KW - bullying prevention

KW - educational policy

KW - educational reform

KW - evaluation

KW - evidence-based best practices

KW - harassment, intimidation, and bullying (HIB)

KW - psychology

KW - research methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922861010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922861010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14567534

DO - https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14567534

M3 - Review article

SN - 0013-189X

VL - 44

SP - 27

EP - 36

JO - Educational Researcher

JF - Educational Researcher

IS - 1

ER -

Guidance for Schools Selecting Antibullying Approaches: Translating Evidence-Based Strategies to Contemporary Implementation Realities

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this