How to Disagree about How to Disagree

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter argues for the incoherence of unrestricted conciliatory views according to which one ought always to modify one's view in the direction of one's peer in cases of peer disagreement. It contends that such views face incoherence when applied to themselves, and goes on to defend a partly-conciliatory view, recommending conciliation on topics other than disagreement itself.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDisagreement
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191594236
ISBN (Print)9780199226078
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 5 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Arts and Humanities

Keywords

  • Conciliation
  • Incoherence
  • Peer disagreement
  • Self-undermining views

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to Disagree about How to Disagree'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this