Improving performance of student teams through exploring learning preferences

Kevin Dahm, James Newell, Brian Lefebvre, Roberta Harvey

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Student awareness and understanding of their learning own skills, performance, preferences, and barriers is referred to as metacognition. This paper describes efforts to instill metacognition in engineering students at Rowan University, through writing and team-building exercises. This study examines teams of students doing open-ended research and design projects through the Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic. The Learning Combination Inventory (LCI) is a survey instrument developed by Johnston and Dainton. The theoretical basis for the LCI is the Interactive Learning Model, which posits that learning processes occur through four distinct learning patterns: sequential, precise, technical, and confluent. The LCI was used to profile the learning style of each student in the Rowan Chemical Engineering department. During the fall 2003 semester, teams of students reviewed their LCI profiles with faculty, wrote team charters and used biweekly written status reports to reflect on their progress throughout the semester. These activities were intended to further each student's awareness of his/her own abilities, heighten awareness of the variety of individuals and foster improved inter-personal and teaming skills. These activities were well received but there was no definitive test of whether they actually improved student performance. In the 2004/05 academic year, teams were divided into four groups: some went through the LCI analyses, some who did the writing exercises, some did both and some did neither. Surveys are being used to assess the attitude of students from all four groups towards their teams, and rubrics will be applied to their final project reports to evaluate the quality of the work produced by each team. This paper will present the results of this control study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005
Event05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase - Cincinnati, OH, United States
Duration: Oct 30 2005Nov 4 2005

Other

Other05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase
CountryUnited States
CityCincinnati, OH
Period10/30/0511/4/05

Fingerprint

Students
Chemical engineering

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Dahm, K., Newell, J., Lefebvre, B., & Harvey, R. (2005). Improving performance of student teams through exploring learning preferences. Paper presented at 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Dahm, Kevin ; Newell, James ; Lefebvre, Brian ; Harvey, Roberta. / Improving performance of student teams through exploring learning preferences. Paper presented at 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Cincinnati, OH, United States.1 p.
@conference{f7f24f7014a64a9e9e59867b21c20afa,
title = "Improving performance of student teams through exploring learning preferences",
abstract = "Student awareness and understanding of their learning own skills, performance, preferences, and barriers is referred to as metacognition. This paper describes efforts to instill metacognition in engineering students at Rowan University, through writing and team-building exercises. This study examines teams of students doing open-ended research and design projects through the Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic. The Learning Combination Inventory (LCI) is a survey instrument developed by Johnston and Dainton. The theoretical basis for the LCI is the Interactive Learning Model, which posits that learning processes occur through four distinct learning patterns: sequential, precise, technical, and confluent. The LCI was used to profile the learning style of each student in the Rowan Chemical Engineering department. During the fall 2003 semester, teams of students reviewed their LCI profiles with faculty, wrote team charters and used biweekly written status reports to reflect on their progress throughout the semester. These activities were intended to further each student's awareness of his/her own abilities, heighten awareness of the variety of individuals and foster improved inter-personal and teaming skills. These activities were well received but there was no definitive test of whether they actually improved student performance. In the 2004/05 academic year, teams were divided into four groups: some went through the LCI analyses, some who did the writing exercises, some did both and some did neither. Surveys are being used to assess the attitude of students from all four groups towards their teams, and rubrics will be applied to their final project reports to evaluate the quality of the work produced by each team. This paper will present the results of this control study.",
author = "Kevin Dahm and James Newell and Brian Lefebvre and Roberta Harvey",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
note = "05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase ; Conference date: 30-10-2005 Through 04-11-2005",

}

Dahm, K, Newell, J, Lefebvre, B & Harvey, R 2005, 'Improving performance of student teams through exploring learning preferences' Paper presented at 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 10/30/05 - 11/4/05, .

Improving performance of student teams through exploring learning preferences. / Dahm, Kevin; Newell, James; Lefebvre, Brian; Harvey, Roberta.

2005. Paper presented at 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Improving performance of student teams through exploring learning preferences

AU - Dahm, Kevin

AU - Newell, James

AU - Lefebvre, Brian

AU - Harvey, Roberta

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - Student awareness and understanding of their learning own skills, performance, preferences, and barriers is referred to as metacognition. This paper describes efforts to instill metacognition in engineering students at Rowan University, through writing and team-building exercises. This study examines teams of students doing open-ended research and design projects through the Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic. The Learning Combination Inventory (LCI) is a survey instrument developed by Johnston and Dainton. The theoretical basis for the LCI is the Interactive Learning Model, which posits that learning processes occur through four distinct learning patterns: sequential, precise, technical, and confluent. The LCI was used to profile the learning style of each student in the Rowan Chemical Engineering department. During the fall 2003 semester, teams of students reviewed their LCI profiles with faculty, wrote team charters and used biweekly written status reports to reflect on their progress throughout the semester. These activities were intended to further each student's awareness of his/her own abilities, heighten awareness of the variety of individuals and foster improved inter-personal and teaming skills. These activities were well received but there was no definitive test of whether they actually improved student performance. In the 2004/05 academic year, teams were divided into four groups: some went through the LCI analyses, some who did the writing exercises, some did both and some did neither. Surveys are being used to assess the attitude of students from all four groups towards their teams, and rubrics will be applied to their final project reports to evaluate the quality of the work produced by each team. This paper will present the results of this control study.

AB - Student awareness and understanding of their learning own skills, performance, preferences, and barriers is referred to as metacognition. This paper describes efforts to instill metacognition in engineering students at Rowan University, through writing and team-building exercises. This study examines teams of students doing open-ended research and design projects through the Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic. The Learning Combination Inventory (LCI) is a survey instrument developed by Johnston and Dainton. The theoretical basis for the LCI is the Interactive Learning Model, which posits that learning processes occur through four distinct learning patterns: sequential, precise, technical, and confluent. The LCI was used to profile the learning style of each student in the Rowan Chemical Engineering department. During the fall 2003 semester, teams of students reviewed their LCI profiles with faculty, wrote team charters and used biweekly written status reports to reflect on their progress throughout the semester. These activities were intended to further each student's awareness of his/her own abilities, heighten awareness of the variety of individuals and foster improved inter-personal and teaming skills. These activities were well received but there was no definitive test of whether they actually improved student performance. In the 2004/05 academic year, teams were divided into four groups: some went through the LCI analyses, some who did the writing exercises, some did both and some did neither. Surveys are being used to assess the attitude of students from all four groups towards their teams, and rubrics will be applied to their final project reports to evaluate the quality of the work produced by each team. This paper will present the results of this control study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645639786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645639786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

ER -

Dahm K, Newell J, Lefebvre B, Harvey R. Improving performance of student teams through exploring learning preferences. 2005. Paper presented at 05AIChE: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase, Cincinnati, OH, United States.