Indirectly direct: An account of demonstratives and pointing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There has been a long debate on whether demonstratives are directly referential as Kaplan originally argued, or indirectly referential like a definite description. I propose a new analysis of demonstratives that combines intuitions from both direct and indirect approaches. The demonstrative is analyzed as an indirectly referential expression with a binary maximality operator that takes two arguments, where the second argument can be a deictic pointing, an anaphoric index, or a relative clause. Direct reference is encoded not in the meaning of the demonstrative but in the meaning contributed by the pointing gesture, thus capturing both direct and indirect uses. I further propose that some pronouns in English function as demonstratives, realizing the binary structure and competing with the demonstrative. The main advantages of this proposal include (a) deriving the distribution of pronominal and adnominal demonstratives systematically; (b) capturing the unique interaction that demonstratives have with a pointing gesture; and (c) locating English demonstratives against a larger, cross-linguistic picture.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)1345-1393
Number of pages49
JournalLinguistics and Philosophy
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Language

Keywords

  • Anaphora
  • Deixis
  • Demonstratives
  • Pointing
  • Pronouns
  • Reference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indirectly direct: An account of demonstratives and pointing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this