TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrating Concentration-Dependent Toxicity Data and Toxicokinetics To Inform Hepatotoxicity Response Pathways
AU - Russo, Daniel P.
AU - Aleksunes, Lauren M.
AU - Goyak, Katy
AU - Qian, Hua
AU - Zhu, Hao
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [Grants R01ES031080, R35ES031709, and P30ES005022], National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Grant R01GM148743), National Science Foundation (Grant 2211489), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [Grant UL1TR003017]. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.
PY - 2023/8/22
Y1 - 2023/8/22
N2 - Failure of animal models to predict hepatotoxicity in humans has created a push to develop biological pathway-based alternatives, such as those that use in vitro assays. Public screening programs (e.g., ToxCast/Tox21 programs) have tested thousands of chemicals using in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays. Developing pathway-based models for simple biological pathways, such as endocrine disruption, has proven successful, but development remains a challenge for complex toxicities like hepatotoxicity, due to the many biological events involved. To this goal, we aimed to develop a computational strategy for developing pathway-based models for complex toxicities. Using a database of 2171 chemicals with human hepatotoxicity classifications, we identified 157 out of 1600+ ToxCast/Tox21 HTS assays to be associated with human hepatotoxicity. Then, a computational framework was used to group these assays by biological target or mechanisms into 52 key event (KE) models of hepatotoxicity. KE model output is a KE score summarizing chemical potency against a hepatotoxicity-relevant biological target or mechanism. Grouping hepatotoxic chemicals based on the chemical structure revealed chemical classes with high KE scores plausibly informing their hepatotoxicity mechanisms. Using KE scores and supervised learning to predict in vivo hepatotoxicity, including toxicokinetic information, improved the predictive performance. This new approach can be a universal computational toxicology strategy for various chemical toxicity evaluations.
AB - Failure of animal models to predict hepatotoxicity in humans has created a push to develop biological pathway-based alternatives, such as those that use in vitro assays. Public screening programs (e.g., ToxCast/Tox21 programs) have tested thousands of chemicals using in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays. Developing pathway-based models for simple biological pathways, such as endocrine disruption, has proven successful, but development remains a challenge for complex toxicities like hepatotoxicity, due to the many biological events involved. To this goal, we aimed to develop a computational strategy for developing pathway-based models for complex toxicities. Using a database of 2171 chemicals with human hepatotoxicity classifications, we identified 157 out of 1600+ ToxCast/Tox21 HTS assays to be associated with human hepatotoxicity. Then, a computational framework was used to group these assays by biological target or mechanisms into 52 key event (KE) models of hepatotoxicity. KE model output is a KE score summarizing chemical potency against a hepatotoxicity-relevant biological target or mechanism. Grouping hepatotoxic chemicals based on the chemical structure revealed chemical classes with high KE scores plausibly informing their hepatotoxicity mechanisms. Using KE scores and supervised learning to predict in vivo hepatotoxicity, including toxicokinetic information, improved the predictive performance. This new approach can be a universal computational toxicology strategy for various chemical toxicity evaluations.
KW - adverse outcome pathway modeling
KW - big data
KW - biological pathway modeling
KW - data mining
KW - supervised learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168428084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85168428084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c02792
DO - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c02792
M3 - Article
C2 - 37566783
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 57
SP - 12291
EP - 12301
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 33
ER -