Knowledge Management and the Teaching of Technical Communication: Where Does Knowledge Reside in the Theory vs. Practice Debate?

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

This article looks at the current theory vs. practice debate in the teaching of technical communication from the viewpoint of knowledge management and transfer. Where does the most relevant knowledge reside and how best can it be communicated? In an attempt to answer this question,I have surveyed eight articles from three journals, exploring the source of each and its position in relation to knowledge management. My conclusion is that the workplace provides data, the academy provides information, but knowledge always resides in people. A secondary finding is that class issues still play a role in the techne vs. praxis debate. Theory has a higher status than practice and this disparity leads to exclusionary tactics that can limit knowledge generation and transfer, especially in regard to multicultural and multinational knowledge workers. My recommendation is that exclusionary practices should be avoided and language should be simplified in order to include the greatest possible number of participants in the knowledge-making process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages348-352
Number of pages5
StatePublished - Nov 21 2003
EventIPCC 2003 The Shape of Knowledge Proceedings: 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference - Orlando, FL, United States
Duration: Sep 21 2003Sep 24 2003

Other

OtherIPCC 2003 The Shape of Knowledge Proceedings: 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando, FL
Period9/21/039/24/03

Fingerprint

Knowledge management
knowledge management
Teaching
communication
Communication
knowledge transfer
tactics
academy
workplace
worker
language
knowledge

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)
  • Communication

Keywords

  • Knowledge
  • Multiculturalism
  • Practice
  • Teaching
  • Theory

Cite this

Johnson, C. S. (2003). Knowledge Management and the Teaching of Technical Communication: Where Does Knowledge Reside in the Theory vs. Practice Debate?. 348-352. Paper presented at IPCC 2003 The Shape of Knowledge Proceedings: 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Orlando, FL, United States.
Johnson, Carol Siri. / Knowledge Management and the Teaching of Technical Communication : Where Does Knowledge Reside in the Theory vs. Practice Debate?. Paper presented at IPCC 2003 The Shape of Knowledge Proceedings: 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Orlando, FL, United States.5 p.
@conference{213757e6daa9406db0a3d1902cd7d142,
title = "Knowledge Management and the Teaching of Technical Communication: Where Does Knowledge Reside in the Theory vs. Practice Debate?",
abstract = "This article looks at the current theory vs. practice debate in the teaching of technical communication from the viewpoint of knowledge management and transfer. Where does the most relevant knowledge reside and how best can it be communicated? In an attempt to answer this question,I have surveyed eight articles from three journals, exploring the source of each and its position in relation to knowledge management. My conclusion is that the workplace provides data, the academy provides information, but knowledge always resides in people. A secondary finding is that class issues still play a role in the techne vs. praxis debate. Theory has a higher status than practice and this disparity leads to exclusionary tactics that can limit knowledge generation and transfer, especially in regard to multicultural and multinational knowledge workers. My recommendation is that exclusionary practices should be avoided and language should be simplified in order to include the greatest possible number of participants in the knowledge-making process.",
keywords = "Knowledge, Multiculturalism, Practice, Teaching, Theory",
author = "Johnson, {Carol Siri}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
day = "21",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "348--352",
note = "IPCC 2003 The Shape of Knowledge Proceedings: 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference ; Conference date: 21-09-2003 Through 24-09-2003",

}

Johnson, CS 2003, 'Knowledge Management and the Teaching of Technical Communication: Where Does Knowledge Reside in the Theory vs. Practice Debate?' Paper presented at IPCC 2003 The Shape of Knowledge Proceedings: 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Orlando, FL, United States, 9/21/03 - 9/24/03, pp. 348-352.

Knowledge Management and the Teaching of Technical Communication : Where Does Knowledge Reside in the Theory vs. Practice Debate? / Johnson, Carol Siri.

2003. 348-352 Paper presented at IPCC 2003 The Shape of Knowledge Proceedings: 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Orlando, FL, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Knowledge Management and the Teaching of Technical Communication

T2 - Where Does Knowledge Reside in the Theory vs. Practice Debate?

AU - Johnson, Carol Siri

PY - 2003/11/21

Y1 - 2003/11/21

N2 - This article looks at the current theory vs. practice debate in the teaching of technical communication from the viewpoint of knowledge management and transfer. Where does the most relevant knowledge reside and how best can it be communicated? In an attempt to answer this question,I have surveyed eight articles from three journals, exploring the source of each and its position in relation to knowledge management. My conclusion is that the workplace provides data, the academy provides information, but knowledge always resides in people. A secondary finding is that class issues still play a role in the techne vs. praxis debate. Theory has a higher status than practice and this disparity leads to exclusionary tactics that can limit knowledge generation and transfer, especially in regard to multicultural and multinational knowledge workers. My recommendation is that exclusionary practices should be avoided and language should be simplified in order to include the greatest possible number of participants in the knowledge-making process.

AB - This article looks at the current theory vs. practice debate in the teaching of technical communication from the viewpoint of knowledge management and transfer. Where does the most relevant knowledge reside and how best can it be communicated? In an attempt to answer this question,I have surveyed eight articles from three journals, exploring the source of each and its position in relation to knowledge management. My conclusion is that the workplace provides data, the academy provides information, but knowledge always resides in people. A secondary finding is that class issues still play a role in the techne vs. praxis debate. Theory has a higher status than practice and this disparity leads to exclusionary tactics that can limit knowledge generation and transfer, especially in regard to multicultural and multinational knowledge workers. My recommendation is that exclusionary practices should be avoided and language should be simplified in order to include the greatest possible number of participants in the knowledge-making process.

KW - Knowledge

KW - Multiculturalism

KW - Practice

KW - Teaching

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242676156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242676156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

SP - 348

EP - 352

ER -

Johnson CS. Knowledge Management and the Teaching of Technical Communication: Where Does Knowledge Reside in the Theory vs. Practice Debate?. 2003. Paper presented at IPCC 2003 The Shape of Knowledge Proceedings: 2003 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Orlando, FL, United States.