Large eddy simulation of pressure and dilution-jet effects on soot formation in a model aircraft swirl combustor

Shao Teng Chong, Malik Hassanaly, Heeseok Koo, Michael Edward Mueller, Venkat Raman, Klaus Peter Geigle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Soot formation in a model aircraft engine configuration operating at elevated pressures is studied using large eddy simulation (LES) and detailed models for precursor and soot population evolution. Specifically, pressure and secondary oxidation air injection effects on soot formation are simulated. The configuration simulated is a dual-swirl ethylene/air combustor operating at pressures of 3 and 5 bars, with and without secondary oxidation air injection. The inflow conditions are chosen such that for the two different pressures, the only hydrodynamic change is the Reynolds number. Detailed comparisons with experimental data show that the simulation captures gas-phase statistics accurately. Although the spatial structure of soot formation is captured, including some of the trends for different operating conditions, the quantitative comparisons had significant differences. This could be attributed to the large distribution in the measurements or the chemical/physical models for soot formation. Detailed analysis showed that soot mass generation in such devices is driven by acetylene-based surface growth, with strong oxidation zones that significantly reduce net soot emissions. More importantly, soot formation occurs due to a spatially and temporally intermittent phenomena, where a small set of fluid trajectories that deposit fuel-rich pockets into the right gas-phase conditions is responsible for the bulk of soot mass generated. The occurrence of these relatively low-frequency trajectories is due to large scale unsteadiness caused by the strong swirl near the fuel jets. Lagrangian particle trajectory analysis revealed that lower pressure case without sidejet injection encourages entrainment of soot particles into the inner recirculation zone, increasing the residence time and leading to increased soot volume fraction. When pressure is increased from 3 to 5 bar, these particles move through a different mixture fraction-progress variable phase space. Consequently, there is a hydrodynamic scaling mode introduced, which can produce interesting variations from the nominal pressure scaling for soot production. These studies point to an intricate dependence of soot formation on large-scale turbulent flows, which is generally non-universal and not observed in canonical jet flames.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)452-472
Number of pages21
JournalCombustion and Flame
Volume192
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

aircraft models
Soot
Aircraft models
Large eddy simulation
soot
large eddy simulation
combustion chambers
Combustors
Dilution
dilution
Trajectories
injection
Oxidation
oxidation
air
Hydrodynamics
Air
Gases
hydrodynamics
trajectories

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Fuel Technology

Cite this

Chong, Shao Teng ; Hassanaly, Malik ; Koo, Heeseok ; Mueller, Michael Edward ; Raman, Venkat ; Geigle, Klaus Peter. / Large eddy simulation of pressure and dilution-jet effects on soot formation in a model aircraft swirl combustor. In: Combustion and Flame. 2018 ; Vol. 192. pp. 452-472.
@article{15fb52cdfacb482b8572e1217aa791c6,
title = "Large eddy simulation of pressure and dilution-jet effects on soot formation in a model aircraft swirl combustor",
abstract = "Soot formation in a model aircraft engine configuration operating at elevated pressures is studied using large eddy simulation (LES) and detailed models for precursor and soot population evolution. Specifically, pressure and secondary oxidation air injection effects on soot formation are simulated. The configuration simulated is a dual-swirl ethylene/air combustor operating at pressures of 3 and 5 bars, with and without secondary oxidation air injection. The inflow conditions are chosen such that for the two different pressures, the only hydrodynamic change is the Reynolds number. Detailed comparisons with experimental data show that the simulation captures gas-phase statistics accurately. Although the spatial structure of soot formation is captured, including some of the trends for different operating conditions, the quantitative comparisons had significant differences. This could be attributed to the large distribution in the measurements or the chemical/physical models for soot formation. Detailed analysis showed that soot mass generation in such devices is driven by acetylene-based surface growth, with strong oxidation zones that significantly reduce net soot emissions. More importantly, soot formation occurs due to a spatially and temporally intermittent phenomena, where a small set of fluid trajectories that deposit fuel-rich pockets into the right gas-phase conditions is responsible for the bulk of soot mass generated. The occurrence of these relatively low-frequency trajectories is due to large scale unsteadiness caused by the strong swirl near the fuel jets. Lagrangian particle trajectory analysis revealed that lower pressure case without sidejet injection encourages entrainment of soot particles into the inner recirculation zone, increasing the residence time and leading to increased soot volume fraction. When pressure is increased from 3 to 5 bar, these particles move through a different mixture fraction-progress variable phase space. Consequently, there is a hydrodynamic scaling mode introduced, which can produce interesting variations from the nominal pressure scaling for soot production. These studies point to an intricate dependence of soot formation on large-scale turbulent flows, which is generally non-universal and not observed in canonical jet flames.",
author = "Chong, {Shao Teng} and Malik Hassanaly and Heeseok Koo and Mueller, {Michael Edward} and Venkat Raman and Geigle, {Klaus Peter}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.02.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "192",
pages = "452--472",
journal = "Combustion and Flame",
issn = "0010-2180",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Large eddy simulation of pressure and dilution-jet effects on soot formation in a model aircraft swirl combustor. / Chong, Shao Teng; Hassanaly, Malik; Koo, Heeseok; Mueller, Michael Edward; Raman, Venkat; Geigle, Klaus Peter.

In: Combustion and Flame, Vol. 192, 01.06.2018, p. 452-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Large eddy simulation of pressure and dilution-jet effects on soot formation in a model aircraft swirl combustor

AU - Chong, Shao Teng

AU - Hassanaly, Malik

AU - Koo, Heeseok

AU - Mueller, Michael Edward

AU - Raman, Venkat

AU - Geigle, Klaus Peter

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Soot formation in a model aircraft engine configuration operating at elevated pressures is studied using large eddy simulation (LES) and detailed models for precursor and soot population evolution. Specifically, pressure and secondary oxidation air injection effects on soot formation are simulated. The configuration simulated is a dual-swirl ethylene/air combustor operating at pressures of 3 and 5 bars, with and without secondary oxidation air injection. The inflow conditions are chosen such that for the two different pressures, the only hydrodynamic change is the Reynolds number. Detailed comparisons with experimental data show that the simulation captures gas-phase statistics accurately. Although the spatial structure of soot formation is captured, including some of the trends for different operating conditions, the quantitative comparisons had significant differences. This could be attributed to the large distribution in the measurements or the chemical/physical models for soot formation. Detailed analysis showed that soot mass generation in such devices is driven by acetylene-based surface growth, with strong oxidation zones that significantly reduce net soot emissions. More importantly, soot formation occurs due to a spatially and temporally intermittent phenomena, where a small set of fluid trajectories that deposit fuel-rich pockets into the right gas-phase conditions is responsible for the bulk of soot mass generated. The occurrence of these relatively low-frequency trajectories is due to large scale unsteadiness caused by the strong swirl near the fuel jets. Lagrangian particle trajectory analysis revealed that lower pressure case without sidejet injection encourages entrainment of soot particles into the inner recirculation zone, increasing the residence time and leading to increased soot volume fraction. When pressure is increased from 3 to 5 bar, these particles move through a different mixture fraction-progress variable phase space. Consequently, there is a hydrodynamic scaling mode introduced, which can produce interesting variations from the nominal pressure scaling for soot production. These studies point to an intricate dependence of soot formation on large-scale turbulent flows, which is generally non-universal and not observed in canonical jet flames.

AB - Soot formation in a model aircraft engine configuration operating at elevated pressures is studied using large eddy simulation (LES) and detailed models for precursor and soot population evolution. Specifically, pressure and secondary oxidation air injection effects on soot formation are simulated. The configuration simulated is a dual-swirl ethylene/air combustor operating at pressures of 3 and 5 bars, with and without secondary oxidation air injection. The inflow conditions are chosen such that for the two different pressures, the only hydrodynamic change is the Reynolds number. Detailed comparisons with experimental data show that the simulation captures gas-phase statistics accurately. Although the spatial structure of soot formation is captured, including some of the trends for different operating conditions, the quantitative comparisons had significant differences. This could be attributed to the large distribution in the measurements or the chemical/physical models for soot formation. Detailed analysis showed that soot mass generation in such devices is driven by acetylene-based surface growth, with strong oxidation zones that significantly reduce net soot emissions. More importantly, soot formation occurs due to a spatially and temporally intermittent phenomena, where a small set of fluid trajectories that deposit fuel-rich pockets into the right gas-phase conditions is responsible for the bulk of soot mass generated. The occurrence of these relatively low-frequency trajectories is due to large scale unsteadiness caused by the strong swirl near the fuel jets. Lagrangian particle trajectory analysis revealed that lower pressure case without sidejet injection encourages entrainment of soot particles into the inner recirculation zone, increasing the residence time and leading to increased soot volume fraction. When pressure is increased from 3 to 5 bar, these particles move through a different mixture fraction-progress variable phase space. Consequently, there is a hydrodynamic scaling mode introduced, which can produce interesting variations from the nominal pressure scaling for soot production. These studies point to an intricate dependence of soot formation on large-scale turbulent flows, which is generally non-universal and not observed in canonical jet flames.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043599911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043599911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.02.021

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.02.021

M3 - Article

VL - 192

SP - 452

EP - 472

JO - Combustion and Flame

JF - Combustion and Flame

SN - 0010-2180

ER -