Micro-Exclusions, Raunch Aesthetics and In-Jokes

A Rogue Hmong Raciosexual Parody

Louisa Schein, Bee Vang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This essay reads closely into the racial politics of “Thao Does Walt,” a YouTube parody of one particular scene in Eastwood’s Gran Torino, featuring Bee Vang, the lead actor from the original. The short, co-created by the authors and a Hmong artistic team, sought to trouble clichéd Asian American masculinities, not by defying them but by caricaturing dominant tropes, deploying camp, humor, raunch and queering tactics to make visible the turgidity of stereotyping. Moving from a production-studies approach that interrogates how the team’s use of silliness and hyperbole in scripting and shooting was to suggest complex personhood and its erasure, we turn to the “failures” of reception, reflecting on how canons of lockstep legibility contravened our queer satiric approach to counter-representation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-115
Number of pages23
JournalVisual Anthropology
Volume31
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2018

Fingerprint

joke
satire
aesthetics
exclusion
humor
tactics
masculinity
politics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology

Cite this

@article{4f3c316ab00348059ce9f5c73f855bf2,
title = "Micro-Exclusions, Raunch Aesthetics and In-Jokes: A Rogue Hmong Raciosexual Parody",
abstract = "This essay reads closely into the racial politics of “Thao Does Walt,” a YouTube parody of one particular scene in Eastwood’s Gran Torino, featuring Bee Vang, the lead actor from the original. The short, co-created by the authors and a Hmong artistic team, sought to trouble clich{\'e}d Asian American masculinities, not by defying them but by caricaturing dominant tropes, deploying camp, humor, raunch and queering tactics to make visible the turgidity of stereotyping. Moving from a production-studies approach that interrogates how the team’s use of silliness and hyperbole in scripting and shooting was to suggest complex personhood and its erasure, we turn to the “failures” of reception, reflecting on how canons of lockstep legibility contravened our queer satiric approach to counter-representation.",
author = "Louisa Schein and Bee Vang",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2018.1428016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "93--115",
journal = "Visual Anthropology",
issn = "0894-9468",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-2",

}

Micro-Exclusions, Raunch Aesthetics and In-Jokes : A Rogue Hmong Raciosexual Parody. / Schein, Louisa; Vang, Bee.

In: Visual Anthropology, Vol. 31, No. 1-2, 15.03.2018, p. 93-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Micro-Exclusions, Raunch Aesthetics and In-Jokes

T2 - A Rogue Hmong Raciosexual Parody

AU - Schein, Louisa

AU - Vang, Bee

PY - 2018/3/15

Y1 - 2018/3/15

N2 - This essay reads closely into the racial politics of “Thao Does Walt,” a YouTube parody of one particular scene in Eastwood’s Gran Torino, featuring Bee Vang, the lead actor from the original. The short, co-created by the authors and a Hmong artistic team, sought to trouble clichéd Asian American masculinities, not by defying them but by caricaturing dominant tropes, deploying camp, humor, raunch and queering tactics to make visible the turgidity of stereotyping. Moving from a production-studies approach that interrogates how the team’s use of silliness and hyperbole in scripting and shooting was to suggest complex personhood and its erasure, we turn to the “failures” of reception, reflecting on how canons of lockstep legibility contravened our queer satiric approach to counter-representation.

AB - This essay reads closely into the racial politics of “Thao Does Walt,” a YouTube parody of one particular scene in Eastwood’s Gran Torino, featuring Bee Vang, the lead actor from the original. The short, co-created by the authors and a Hmong artistic team, sought to trouble clichéd Asian American masculinities, not by defying them but by caricaturing dominant tropes, deploying camp, humor, raunch and queering tactics to make visible the turgidity of stereotyping. Moving from a production-studies approach that interrogates how the team’s use of silliness and hyperbole in scripting and shooting was to suggest complex personhood and its erasure, we turn to the “failures” of reception, reflecting on how canons of lockstep legibility contravened our queer satiric approach to counter-representation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045376952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045376952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2018.1428016

DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2018.1428016

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 93

EP - 115

JO - Visual Anthropology

JF - Visual Anthropology

SN - 0894-9468

IS - 1-2

ER -