Ms B and Diane Pretty: A commentary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In two recent court cases, Ms B, a paralysed competent adult, was allowed to end her life; Mrs Pretty, another paralysed competent adult, was not. In legal terms, the essential difference between the two cases is that Ms B was seeking the withdrawal of treatment, whereas Mrs Pretty was asking for assistance in ending her life. I argue that while this distinction may accurately state the law that governs these situations, it does not rest on a defensible moral basis. Both the women should have been allowed to choose the manner in which they would die.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)234-235
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ms B and Diane Pretty: A commentary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this