Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members

Susan M. Rawl; Sandra Bailey; Beatrice Cork; Matthew Fields; Thomas Griffin; Laura Haunert; Judy Kline; Connie Krier; Juan Lagunes; Ruth L. Lambert; Caeli Malloy; Jack Quick; Rivienne Shedd-Steele; Sylvia Strom; Lisa Carter-Harris

doi:10.1177/0193945921993174

Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members

Susan M. Rawl, Sandra Bailey, Beatrice Cork, Matthew Fields, Thomas Griffin, Laura Haunert, Judy Kline, Connie Krier, Juan Lagunes, Ruth L. Lambert, Caeli Malloy, Jack Quick, Rivienne Shedd-Steele, Sylvia Strom, Lisa Carter-Harris

Center for Discovery and Innovation

Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) defines engagement in research as the meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, insurers, and others throughout the entire research process—from planning to conducting the study to disseminating study results. The purposes of this paper are to (a) describe methods used to engage community members across the various phases of a PCORI-funded comparative effectiveness trial to increase colorectal cancer screening; and (b) report results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of community advisory board members’ experiences on this project. Decisions to join and stay engaged with the study included feeling valued and appreciated, being compensated, the opportunity to contribute to research based on their skills and expertise, and being committed to colon cancer prevention efforts. Challenges identified by advisory board members included the significant time commitment, transportation, and meeting location. Lessons learned and guidance for researchers committed to patient and community engagement are described.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	930-938
Number of pages	9
Journal	Western Journal of Nursing Research
Volume	43
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945921993174
State	Published - Oct 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Nursing

Keywords

community advisory board
community engagement
comparative effectiveness trial
evaluation
patient engagement

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/0193945921993174

Cite this

Rawl, S. M., Bailey, S., Cork, B., Fields, M., Griffin, T., Haunert, L., Kline, J., Krier, C., Lagunes, J., Lambert, R. L., Malloy, C., Quick, J., Shedd-Steele, R., Strom, S., & Carter-Harris, L. (2021). Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 43(10), 930-938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945921993174

@article{a690125b79fc49a881706633779b421f,

title = "Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members",

abstract = "The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) defines engagement in research as the meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, insurers, and others throughout the entire research process—from planning to conducting the study to disseminating study results. The purposes of this paper are to (a) describe methods used to engage community members across the various phases of a PCORI-funded comparative effectiveness trial to increase colorectal cancer screening; and (b) report results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of community advisory board members{\textquoteright} experiences on this project. Decisions to join and stay engaged with the study included feeling valued and appreciated, being compensated, the opportunity to contribute to research based on their skills and expertise, and being committed to colon cancer prevention efforts. Challenges identified by advisory board members included the significant time commitment, transportation, and meeting location. Lessons learned and guidance for researchers committed to patient and community engagement are described.",

keywords = "community advisory board, community engagement, comparative effectiveness trial, evaluation, patient engagement",

author = "Rawl, {Susan M.} and Sandra Bailey and Beatrice Cork and Matthew Fields and Thomas Griffin and Laura Haunert and Judy Kline and Connie Krier and Juan Lagunes and Lambert, {Ruth L.} and Caeli Malloy and Jack Quick and Rivienne Shedd-Steele and Sylvia Strom and Lisa Carter-Harris",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021.",

year = "2021",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1177/0193945921993174",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "930--938",

journal = "Western Journal of Nursing Research",

issn = "0193-9459",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "10",

}

Rawl, SM, Bailey, S, Cork, B, Fields, M, Griffin, T, Haunert, L, Kline, J, Krier, C, Lagunes, J, Lambert, RL, Malloy, C, Quick, J, Shedd-Steele, R, Strom, S & Carter-Harris, L 2021, 'Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members', Western Journal of Nursing Research, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 930-938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945921993174

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening

T2 - Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members

AU - Rawl, Susan M.

AU - Bailey, Sandra

AU - Cork, Beatrice

AU - Fields, Matthew

AU - Griffin, Thomas

AU - Haunert, Laura

AU - Kline, Judy

AU - Krier, Connie

AU - Lagunes, Juan

AU - Lambert, Ruth L.

AU - Malloy, Caeli

AU - Quick, Jack

AU - Shedd-Steele, Rivienne

AU - Strom, Sylvia

AU - Carter-Harris, Lisa

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

N2 - The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) defines engagement in research as the meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, insurers, and others throughout the entire research process—from planning to conducting the study to disseminating study results. The purposes of this paper are to (a) describe methods used to engage community members across the various phases of a PCORI-funded comparative effectiveness trial to increase colorectal cancer screening; and (b) report results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of community advisory board members’ experiences on this project. Decisions to join and stay engaged with the study included feeling valued and appreciated, being compensated, the opportunity to contribute to research based on their skills and expertise, and being committed to colon cancer prevention efforts. Challenges identified by advisory board members included the significant time commitment, transportation, and meeting location. Lessons learned and guidance for researchers committed to patient and community engagement are described.

AB - The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) defines engagement in research as the meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, insurers, and others throughout the entire research process—from planning to conducting the study to disseminating study results. The purposes of this paper are to (a) describe methods used to engage community members across the various phases of a PCORI-funded comparative effectiveness trial to increase colorectal cancer screening; and (b) report results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of community advisory board members’ experiences on this project. Decisions to join and stay engaged with the study included feeling valued and appreciated, being compensated, the opportunity to contribute to research based on their skills and expertise, and being committed to colon cancer prevention efforts. Challenges identified by advisory board members included the significant time commitment, transportation, and meeting location. Lessons learned and guidance for researchers committed to patient and community engagement are described.

KW - community advisory board

KW - community engagement

KW - comparative effectiveness trial

KW - evaluation

KW - patient engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100978922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0193945921993174

DO - 10.1177/0193945921993174

M3 - Article

C2 - 33586632

SN - 0193-9459

VL - 43

SP - 930

EP - 938

JO - Western Journal of Nursing Research

JF - Western Journal of Nursing Research

IS - 10

ER -

Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this