Pension Substitution in the 1980s: Why the Shift toward Defined Contribution?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

The relative decline of defined benefit (DB) pension plans, and growth of defined contribution (DC) plans, has been often noted but not extensively explored. This paper reports on the construction of a new longitudinal company‐based data set on pension plans for the years 1980‐86 (including all U.S. companies with large plans, and a 10 percent sample of companies with small plans, at any point during this period). The decline in DB coverage is primarily due to fewer participants in companies maintaining such plans, while very little of the growth in DC coverage is due to companies terminating DB plans. Also, multinomial logit analysis of manufacturing company choices indicates that the higher administrative costs of DB plans lead new adopters to favor DC plans, but this explains little of the tremendous growth in DC plans. In addition, higher industry variability and capital intensity, and smaller company size, lead new adopters to favor DC plans.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)218-241
Number of pages24
JournalIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pension Substitution in the 1980s: Why the Shift toward Defined Contribution?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this