Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Phase 2 Study of Zilovertamab Vedotin in Participants with Metastatic Solid Tumors

  • Funda Meric-Bernstam
  • , Martin Gutierrez
  • , Enrique Sanz-Garcia
  • , Diego Villa
  • , Jun Zhang
  • , Jennifer Friedmann
  • , Fengting Yan
  • , Mark A. Socinski
  • , John Sarantopoulos
  • , Luis E. Raez
  • , Quincy S. Chu
  • , Maxime Chénard-Poirier
  • , Manash S. Chatterjee
  • , Hong Ren
  • , Qi Liu
  • , Douglas A. Levine
  • , Komal L. Jhaveri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Zilovertamab vedotin, an antibody–drug conjugate targeting receptor tyrosine kinase–like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1), had manageable safety and promising antitumor activity in participants with relapsed or refractory non–Hodgkin lymphomas. We evaluated zilovertamab vedotin in participants with previously treated metastatic solid tumors. Patients and Methods: This phase 2, open-label, nonrandomized study (NCT04504916) enrolled participants with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, or pancreatic cancer. Participants received zilovertamab vedotin ≤2.5 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (Q1/3W) or <1.75 mg/kg twice every 3 weeks (Q2/3W). The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. ROR1 protein expression was correlated with clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 102 participants were enrolled (Q1/3W, n ¼ 70; Q2/3W, n ¼ 32). The objective response rate was 1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0%–8%] with Q1/3W dosing (one partial response, hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer cohort) and 0% with Q2/3W dosing. The median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 2.3 (2.0–4.1) and 1.9 (1.7–2.1) months, respectively; the median overall survival (95% CI) was 8.3 (5.2–10.3) and 5.5 (4.4–11.0) months, respectively. Across dosing regimens, treatment-related adverse events were reported in 85 participants (83%), most commonly fatigue (29%) and nausea (28%). Treatment-related peripheral neuropathy occurred in 8%. Treatment-related adverse events led to dose interruption/reduction in 32 participants (31%) and permanent treatment discontinuation in 7 (7%). Tissue for ROR1 IHC was available on 17 participants, with only 3 (all nonresponders) showing ROR1 expression. Conclusions: Zilovertamab vedotin had minimal antitumor activity, with only a single responder, and manageable safety in participants with previously treated metastatic solid tumors. Significance: Zilovertamab vedotin had minimal antitumor activity and manageable safety in participants with previously treated metastatic solid tumors of various histologic subtypes. The results suggest that further development of zilovertamab vedotin in these solid tumors is not warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1664-1673
Number of pages10
JournalCancer Research Communications
Volume5
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase 2 Study of Zilovertamab Vedotin in Participants with Metastatic Solid Tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this