Policies and imprisonment: The impact of structured sentencing and determinate sentencing on state incarceration rates, 1978-2004

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policies and imprisonment

T2 - The impact of structured sentencing and determinate sentencing on state incarceration rates, 1978-2004

AU - Stemen, Don

AU - Rengifo, Andres F.

N1 - Funding Information: This research was funded by a grant of the National Institute of Justice (Grant no. 2002-IJ-CX-0027).

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Research has begun to systematically assess the relationship between sentencing policies and state incarceration rates. Prior studies, however, have examined policy-based relationships in isolation, failing to consider the impact of combinations of policies. Using a pooled time series design, this article examines interactions between structured sentencing, determinate sentencing, and state incarceration rates between 1978 and 2004. Results show that constraining release discretion through determinate sentencing matters more than constraining sentencing discretion through structured sentencing. Consistent with prior research, determinate sentencing was associated with lower incarceration rates independent of other policies. Contrary to prior research, however, the presence of presumptive sentencing guidelines was associated with lower incarceration rates only when combined with determinate sentencing. These findings suggest that while a state may effectively insulate sentencing decisions from outside social forces, if it fails to insulate release decisions from those same forces, they will continue to affect imprisonment levels.

AB - Research has begun to systematically assess the relationship between sentencing policies and state incarceration rates. Prior studies, however, have examined policy-based relationships in isolation, failing to consider the impact of combinations of policies. Using a pooled time series design, this article examines interactions between structured sentencing, determinate sentencing, and state incarceration rates between 1978 and 2004. Results show that constraining release discretion through determinate sentencing matters more than constraining sentencing discretion through structured sentencing. Consistent with prior research, determinate sentencing was associated with lower incarceration rates independent of other policies. Contrary to prior research, however, the presence of presumptive sentencing guidelines was associated with lower incarceration rates only when combined with determinate sentencing. These findings suggest that while a state may effectively insulate sentencing decisions from outside social forces, if it fails to insulate release decisions from those same forces, they will continue to affect imprisonment levels.

KW - Corrections

KW - Mass incarceration

KW - Sentencing policies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649573451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649573451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/07418821003694759

DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/07418821003694759

M3 - Article

SN - 0741-8825

VL - 28

SP - 174

EP - 201

JO - Justice Quarterly

JF - Justice Quarterly

IS - 1

ER -