Presidential challenges to judicial supremacy and the politics of constitutional meaning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Conflicts between the Supreme Court and the president are usually regarded as grave challenges to the Constitution and a threat to judicial independence. Such claims misrepresent the nature of these presidential challenges, however. In doing so, they paint an unflattering and inaccurate portrait of American politics and underestimate the strength of American constitutionalism. This article reexamines historical presidential challenges to the judicial authority to interpret constitutional meaning. It argues that rather than being unprincipled attacks on judicial independence, such challenges are best regarded as historically specific efforts to reconsider the meaning and future of American constitutional traditions in times of political crisis and constitutional uncertainty.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)365-395
Number of pages31
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Presidential challenges to judicial supremacy and the politics of constitutional meaning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this