Religion, group threat and sacred values

Hammad Sheikh, Jeremy Ginges, Alin I. Coman, Scott Atran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sacred or protected values have important influences on decision making, particularly in the context of intergroup disputes. Thus far, we know little about the process of a value becoming sacred or why one person may be more likely than another to hold a sacred value. We present evidence that participation in religious ritual and perceived threat to the group lead people to be more likely to consider preferences as protected or sacred values. Specifically, three studies carried out with Americans and Palestinians show: (a) that the more people participate in religious ritual the more likely they are to report a preference to be a sacred value (Studies 1-3); (b) that people claim more sacred values when they are reminded of religious ritual (Study 2); and (c) that the effect of religious ritual on the likelihood of holding a sacred value is amplified by the perception of high threat to the in-group (Study 3). We discuss implications of these findings for understanding intergroup conflicts, and suggest avenues for future research into the emergence and spread of sacred values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)110-118
Number of pages9
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume7
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ceremonial Behavior
Religion
Dissent and Disputes
Decision Making
Threat

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., Coman, A. I., & Atran, S. (2012). Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(2), 110-118.
Sheikh, Hammad ; Ginges, Jeremy ; Coman, Alin I. ; Atran, Scott. / Religion, group threat and sacred values. In: Judgment and Decision Making. 2012 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 110-118.
@article{0321feaa88b24bc3aa233c20bac29fbb,
title = "Religion, group threat and sacred values",
abstract = "Sacred or protected values have important influences on decision making, particularly in the context of intergroup disputes. Thus far, we know little about the process of a value becoming sacred or why one person may be more likely than another to hold a sacred value. We present evidence that participation in religious ritual and perceived threat to the group lead people to be more likely to consider preferences as protected or sacred values. Specifically, three studies carried out with Americans and Palestinians show: (a) that the more people participate in religious ritual the more likely they are to report a preference to be a sacred value (Studies 1-3); (b) that people claim more sacred values when they are reminded of religious ritual (Study 2); and (c) that the effect of religious ritual on the likelihood of holding a sacred value is amplified by the perception of high threat to the in-group (Study 3). We discuss implications of these findings for understanding intergroup conflicts, and suggest avenues for future research into the emergence and spread of sacred values.",
author = "Hammad Sheikh and Jeremy Ginges and Coman, {Alin I.} and Scott Atran",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "110--118",
journal = "Judgment and Decision Making",
issn = "1930-2975",
publisher = "Society for Judgment and Decision Making",
number = "2",

}

Sheikh, H, Ginges, J, Coman, AI & Atran, S 2012, 'Religion, group threat and sacred values', Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 110-118.

Religion, group threat and sacred values. / Sheikh, Hammad; Ginges, Jeremy; Coman, Alin I.; Atran, Scott.

In: Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.03.2012, p. 110-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religion, group threat and sacred values

AU - Sheikh, Hammad

AU - Ginges, Jeremy

AU - Coman, Alin I.

AU - Atran, Scott

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Sacred or protected values have important influences on decision making, particularly in the context of intergroup disputes. Thus far, we know little about the process of a value becoming sacred or why one person may be more likely than another to hold a sacred value. We present evidence that participation in religious ritual and perceived threat to the group lead people to be more likely to consider preferences as protected or sacred values. Specifically, three studies carried out with Americans and Palestinians show: (a) that the more people participate in religious ritual the more likely they are to report a preference to be a sacred value (Studies 1-3); (b) that people claim more sacred values when they are reminded of religious ritual (Study 2); and (c) that the effect of religious ritual on the likelihood of holding a sacred value is amplified by the perception of high threat to the in-group (Study 3). We discuss implications of these findings for understanding intergroup conflicts, and suggest avenues for future research into the emergence and spread of sacred values.

AB - Sacred or protected values have important influences on decision making, particularly in the context of intergroup disputes. Thus far, we know little about the process of a value becoming sacred or why one person may be more likely than another to hold a sacred value. We present evidence that participation in religious ritual and perceived threat to the group lead people to be more likely to consider preferences as protected or sacred values. Specifically, three studies carried out with Americans and Palestinians show: (a) that the more people participate in religious ritual the more likely they are to report a preference to be a sacred value (Studies 1-3); (b) that people claim more sacred values when they are reminded of religious ritual (Study 2); and (c) that the effect of religious ritual on the likelihood of holding a sacred value is amplified by the perception of high threat to the in-group (Study 3). We discuss implications of these findings for understanding intergroup conflicts, and suggest avenues for future research into the emergence and spread of sacred values.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859295956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859295956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 110

EP - 118

JO - Judgment and Decision Making

JF - Judgment and Decision Making

SN - 1930-2975

IS - 2

ER -

Sheikh H, Ginges J, Coman AI, Atran S. Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgment and Decision Making. 2012 Mar 1;7(2):110-118.