RETROSPECTIVE REPORTS REVEAL DIFFERENCES IN PEOPLE'S REASONING.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reasoning for a class of transitive inference problems was studied and the following question were experimentally investigated: (1) Can people give reliable retrospective reports about their reasoning processess? (2) Do people who report different reasoning processes actually reason in different ways? (3) Can people be trained to use different reasoning processes? In the situations studied, subjects' retrospective reports about reasoning contained sufficient information to classify the subjects reliably. Subjects classified as using different reasoning strategies made different amounts and different kinds of reasoning errors. As a result of training, subjects could use reasoning processes that they would not have used spontaneously. These results have implications for developing theories of reasoning and for assessing and modifying reasoning like processes in practical situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1675-1697
Number of pages23
JournalThe Bell System technical journal
Volume62
Issue number6 pt 3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1983
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this