Revisiting the dialogue on the transition from coteaching to inservice teaching

New frameworks, additional benefits and emergent issues

Beth Wassell, Sarah Kate Lavan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this rejoinder, we respond to the major points made by Gallo-Fox (this forum), Beers (this forum), Carambo and Stickney (this forum), and Murphy, Carlisle and Beggs (this forum). We focus primarily on the benefits and considerations that stem from employing additional theoretical frameworks for analyzing research in coteaching. We also address some of the future directions that should be explored in coteaching research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)477-484
Number of pages8
JournalCultural Studies of Science Education
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

dialogue
Teaching

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

@article{7944d01ee0dd478fa19706206805cb92,
title = "Revisiting the dialogue on the transition from coteaching to inservice teaching: New frameworks, additional benefits and emergent issues",
abstract = "In this rejoinder, we respond to the major points made by Gallo-Fox (this forum), Beers (this forum), Carambo and Stickney (this forum), and Murphy, Carlisle and Beggs (this forum). We focus primarily on the benefits and considerations that stem from employing additional theoretical frameworks for analyzing research in coteaching. We also address some of the future directions that should be explored in coteaching research.",
author = "Beth Wassell and Lavan, {Sarah Kate}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9152-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "477--484",
journal = "Cultural Studies of Science Education",
issn = "1871-1502",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the dialogue on the transition from coteaching to inservice teaching

T2 - New frameworks, additional benefits and emergent issues

AU - Wassell, Beth

AU - Lavan, Sarah Kate

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - In this rejoinder, we respond to the major points made by Gallo-Fox (this forum), Beers (this forum), Carambo and Stickney (this forum), and Murphy, Carlisle and Beggs (this forum). We focus primarily on the benefits and considerations that stem from employing additional theoretical frameworks for analyzing research in coteaching. We also address some of the future directions that should be explored in coteaching research.

AB - In this rejoinder, we respond to the major points made by Gallo-Fox (this forum), Beers (this forum), Carambo and Stickney (this forum), and Murphy, Carlisle and Beggs (this forum). We focus primarily on the benefits and considerations that stem from employing additional theoretical frameworks for analyzing research in coteaching. We also address some of the future directions that should be explored in coteaching research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349097364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349097364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9152-7

DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9152-7

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 477

EP - 484

JO - Cultural Studies of Science Education

JF - Cultural Studies of Science Education

SN - 1871-1502

IS - 2

ER -