Scientific Closure and Research Strategies in Uzbekistan*

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Using the example of Uzbekistan, this article examines the challenges and opportunities for conducting field research in a context of tightened scientific closure in those countries with highly autocratic regimes. Methods: Drawing on the author's own field experience conducting elite interviews in Uzbekistan in 2002 and 2003 (as well as many subsequent visits), it examines three strategies of field research that emerged in this context of tightening scientific closure. Results: The article outlines several essential features of authoritarianism in Uzbekistan and tracks the regime's shift toward scientific closure over three distinct phases, tracing out the implications of this shift for those carrying out systematic field research. Conclusions: Uzbekistan illustrates the challenges and opportunities facing researchers under conditions of scientific closure in the 20–30 other countries ruled by hard authoritarian regimes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)894-908
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Science Quarterly
Volume97
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Uzbekistan
field research
regime
authoritarianism
elite
interview
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{8d294aabed3b49719eebbb99da8f4829,
title = "Scientific Closure and Research Strategies in Uzbekistan*",
abstract = "Objectives: Using the example of Uzbekistan, this article examines the challenges and opportunities for conducting field research in a context of tightened scientific closure in those countries with highly autocratic regimes. Methods: Drawing on the author's own field experience conducting elite interviews in Uzbekistan in 2002 and 2003 (as well as many subsequent visits), it examines three strategies of field research that emerged in this context of tightening scientific closure. Results: The article outlines several essential features of authoritarianism in Uzbekistan and tracks the regime's shift toward scientific closure over three distinct phases, tracing out the implications of this shift for those carrying out systematic field research. Conclusions: Uzbekistan illustrates the challenges and opportunities facing researchers under conditions of scientific closure in the 20–30 other countries ruled by hard authoritarian regimes.",
author = "Lawrence Markowitz",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12344",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "894--908",
journal = "Social Science Quarterly",
issn = "0038-4941",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Scientific Closure and Research Strategies in Uzbekistan*. / Markowitz, Lawrence.

In: Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 97, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 894-908.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific Closure and Research Strategies in Uzbekistan*

AU - Markowitz, Lawrence

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Objectives: Using the example of Uzbekistan, this article examines the challenges and opportunities for conducting field research in a context of tightened scientific closure in those countries with highly autocratic regimes. Methods: Drawing on the author's own field experience conducting elite interviews in Uzbekistan in 2002 and 2003 (as well as many subsequent visits), it examines three strategies of field research that emerged in this context of tightening scientific closure. Results: The article outlines several essential features of authoritarianism in Uzbekistan and tracks the regime's shift toward scientific closure over three distinct phases, tracing out the implications of this shift for those carrying out systematic field research. Conclusions: Uzbekistan illustrates the challenges and opportunities facing researchers under conditions of scientific closure in the 20–30 other countries ruled by hard authoritarian regimes.

AB - Objectives: Using the example of Uzbekistan, this article examines the challenges and opportunities for conducting field research in a context of tightened scientific closure in those countries with highly autocratic regimes. Methods: Drawing on the author's own field experience conducting elite interviews in Uzbekistan in 2002 and 2003 (as well as many subsequent visits), it examines three strategies of field research that emerged in this context of tightening scientific closure. Results: The article outlines several essential features of authoritarianism in Uzbekistan and tracks the regime's shift toward scientific closure over three distinct phases, tracing out the implications of this shift for those carrying out systematic field research. Conclusions: Uzbekistan illustrates the challenges and opportunities facing researchers under conditions of scientific closure in the 20–30 other countries ruled by hard authoritarian regimes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997079993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997079993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12344

DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12344

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 894

EP - 908

JO - Social Science Quarterly

JF - Social Science Quarterly

SN - 0038-4941

IS - 4

ER -