Social factors in the facilitation of feeding in chickens

Effects of imitation, arousal, or disinhibition?

D. W. Rajecki, Robert F. Kidd, David Wilder, James Jaeger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

2 experiments investigated the generality of socially enhanced consummatory behavior in chickens and the conditions that influence such enhancement. Exp I, with 24 Cornish Cross chickens, placed 2 consummatory responses (pecking and drinking) in competition. The design of the experiment contrasted 3 common interpretations of social facilitation of feeding in chickens: (a) the imitation of specific responses of another bird, (b) the arousing effect of another bird that energizes dominant responses (to a greater degree or at the expense of subordinate responses), and (c) the calming effect of another bird that results in the disinhibition of all responses inhibited by fear. The 1st 2 interpretations were cast into doubt since (a) social facilitation effects were found regardless of the behavior of the companion, and (b) both dominant and subordinate responses were enhanced in about the same proportion. The 3rd interpretation received some support. Additional evidence for the disinhibition interpretation was found in Exp II, which employed 8 Cornish Cross chickens. Ss placed in the test situation alone exhibited significantly more fear (as measured by the distress call) than Ss tested in pairs. (46 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)510-518
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1975

Fingerprint

imitation
Arousal
social factors
Chickens
Social Facilitation
Birds
interpretation
Fear
Consummatory Behavior
anxiety
experiment
social effects
Drinking
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{dc61744f14334a9f929d3c72f40c4c2b,
title = "Social factors in the facilitation of feeding in chickens: Effects of imitation, arousal, or disinhibition?",
abstract = "2 experiments investigated the generality of socially enhanced consummatory behavior in chickens and the conditions that influence such enhancement. Exp I, with 24 Cornish Cross chickens, placed 2 consummatory responses (pecking and drinking) in competition. The design of the experiment contrasted 3 common interpretations of social facilitation of feeding in chickens: (a) the imitation of specific responses of another bird, (b) the arousing effect of another bird that energizes dominant responses (to a greater degree or at the expense of subordinate responses), and (c) the calming effect of another bird that results in the disinhibition of all responses inhibited by fear. The 1st 2 interpretations were cast into doubt since (a) social facilitation effects were found regardless of the behavior of the companion, and (b) both dominant and subordinate responses were enhanced in about the same proportion. The 3rd interpretation received some support. Additional evidence for the disinhibition interpretation was found in Exp II, which employed 8 Cornish Cross chickens. Ss placed in the test situation alone exhibited significantly more fear (as measured by the distress call) than Ss tested in pairs. (46 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
author = "Rajecki, {D. W.} and Kidd, {Robert F.} and David Wilder and James Jaeger",
year = "1975",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077065",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "510--518",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Social factors in the facilitation of feeding in chickens : Effects of imitation, arousal, or disinhibition? / Rajecki, D. W.; Kidd, Robert F.; Wilder, David; Jaeger, James.

In: Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.09.1975, p. 510-518.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social factors in the facilitation of feeding in chickens

T2 - Effects of imitation, arousal, or disinhibition?

AU - Rajecki, D. W.

AU - Kidd, Robert F.

AU - Wilder, David

AU - Jaeger, James

PY - 1975/9/1

Y1 - 1975/9/1

N2 - 2 experiments investigated the generality of socially enhanced consummatory behavior in chickens and the conditions that influence such enhancement. Exp I, with 24 Cornish Cross chickens, placed 2 consummatory responses (pecking and drinking) in competition. The design of the experiment contrasted 3 common interpretations of social facilitation of feeding in chickens: (a) the imitation of specific responses of another bird, (b) the arousing effect of another bird that energizes dominant responses (to a greater degree or at the expense of subordinate responses), and (c) the calming effect of another bird that results in the disinhibition of all responses inhibited by fear. The 1st 2 interpretations were cast into doubt since (a) social facilitation effects were found regardless of the behavior of the companion, and (b) both dominant and subordinate responses were enhanced in about the same proportion. The 3rd interpretation received some support. Additional evidence for the disinhibition interpretation was found in Exp II, which employed 8 Cornish Cross chickens. Ss placed in the test situation alone exhibited significantly more fear (as measured by the distress call) than Ss tested in pairs. (46 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - 2 experiments investigated the generality of socially enhanced consummatory behavior in chickens and the conditions that influence such enhancement. Exp I, with 24 Cornish Cross chickens, placed 2 consummatory responses (pecking and drinking) in competition. The design of the experiment contrasted 3 common interpretations of social facilitation of feeding in chickens: (a) the imitation of specific responses of another bird, (b) the arousing effect of another bird that energizes dominant responses (to a greater degree or at the expense of subordinate responses), and (c) the calming effect of another bird that results in the disinhibition of all responses inhibited by fear. The 1st 2 interpretations were cast into doubt since (a) social facilitation effects were found regardless of the behavior of the companion, and (b) both dominant and subordinate responses were enhanced in about the same proportion. The 3rd interpretation received some support. Additional evidence for the disinhibition interpretation was found in Exp II, which employed 8 Cornish Cross chickens. Ss placed in the test situation alone exhibited significantly more fear (as measured by the distress call) than Ss tested in pairs. (46 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0343676315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0343676315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077065

DO - https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077065

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 510

EP - 518

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -