TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategic actors' in situ impressions of systematically versus unsystematically variable counterparts
AU - Sheldon, Oliver J.
AU - Plaks, Jason E.
AU - Sridharan, Vasundhara
AU - Shoda, Yuichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Guilford Publications, Inc.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The covariation model of attribution holds that when an actor's behavior varies across situations, observers make situational, rather than dispositional, inferences about the actor. We conducted four studies to test the hypothesis that situationally variable behavior can also elicit strong dispositional inferences when the behavior follows a systematic if⋯then⋯ situation-behavior contingency. In all studies, participants, who believed that they were interacting with another person in a 30-round repeated prisoner's dilemma game, made strong dispositional inferences about counterparts. However, the specific dispositions they inferred depended upon the type of variability the counterpart displayed: positive dispositions (e.g., rational) when the counterpart's behavior followed a systematic (if⋯then⋯) pattern that made sense given the context; negative dispositions (e.g., irrational) when the counterpart's behavior was unsystematic, or when the if⋯then⋯ pattern was inappropriate for the context. Taken together, these studies begin to identify when behaviors that vary across situations improve versus harm perceivers' impressions.
AB - The covariation model of attribution holds that when an actor's behavior varies across situations, observers make situational, rather than dispositional, inferences about the actor. We conducted four studies to test the hypothesis that situationally variable behavior can also elicit strong dispositional inferences when the behavior follows a systematic if⋯then⋯ situation-behavior contingency. In all studies, participants, who believed that they were interacting with another person in a 30-round repeated prisoner's dilemma game, made strong dispositional inferences about counterparts. However, the specific dispositions they inferred depended upon the type of variability the counterpart displayed: positive dispositions (e.g., rational) when the counterpart's behavior followed a systematic (if⋯then⋯) pattern that made sense given the context; negative dispositions (e.g., irrational) when the counterpart's behavior was unsystematic, or when the if⋯then⋯ pattern was inappropriate for the context. Taken together, these studies begin to identify when behaviors that vary across situations improve versus harm perceivers' impressions.
KW - Attribution theory
KW - Behavior variability
KW - Impression formation
KW - Strategic interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048414389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048414389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2018.36.3.324
DO - https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2018.36.3.324
M3 - Article
SN - 0278-016X
VL - 36
SP - 324
EP - 344
JO - Social Cognition
JF - Social Cognition
IS - 3
ER -