Streicker bridge: The impact of monitoring on decision making

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bridge managers often make decisions based on experience or common sense, somehow regardless of the action suggested by instrumental monitoring systems. Managers weigh differently the monitoring results based on their prior perception of the state of the structure and make decisions keeping in mind the possible effects of the action they can undertake. We propose a rational framework to include the impact of these issues on decision making, based on the concept of Value of Information. The methodology is demonstrated through the case study of the Streicker Bridge, a newly built pedestrian bridge on Princeton University campus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationStructural Health Monitoring 2011
Subtitle of host publicationCondition-Based Maintenance and Intelligent Structures - Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring
Pages1847-1854
Number of pages8
Volume2
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011
Event8th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2011: Condition-Based Maintenance and Intelligent Structures - Stanford, CA, United States
Duration: Sep 13 2011Sep 15 2011

Other

Other8th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2011: Condition-Based Maintenance and Intelligent Structures
CountryUnited States
CityStanford, CA
Period9/13/119/15/11

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Streicker bridge: The impact of monitoring on decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Zonta, D., Glisic, B., & Adriaenssens, S. M. (2011). Streicker bridge: The impact of monitoring on decision making. In Structural Health Monitoring 2011: Condition-Based Maintenance and Intelligent Structures - Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (Vol. 2, pp. 1847-1854)