TY - JOUR
T1 - The age of fuzzy bifurcation
T2 - Lessons from the pandemic and the Ukraine War
AU - Higgott, Richard
AU - Reich, Simon
N1 - Funding Information: The authors thank Richard Ned Lebow, Kim Nossal and Martin Rhodes for their comments on a prior draft, as well as the invaluable suggestions of two reviewers. Simon Reich also wishes to acknowledge the support of the Central European University where he spent time as a visiting George Soros Chair during the research and writing of this article. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Global Policy published by Durham University and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Academics, decision-makers and policy makers have suggested that COVID and the war in Ukraine represent an ‘inflection point’. The consequence will be ‘the end of globalisation’, ‘a bipolar Cold War 2.0’ and a return to Containment. In reality, the emerging world order is much messier. The logics of geoeconomics and geopolitics, largely aligned during the Cold War, are now in tension, ruptured by decades of globalisation, America's decline, and China's ascent. Consequently, US security allies now often wrestle with the fact that their economic ties link them to US rivals, notably China, or adversaries, like Russia. The pandemic and war have wrought geopolitical and economic adjustments, but any resemblance to Cold War blocs is superficial. What is consolidating is an era best described as fuzzy bifurcation. Unlike the Cold War, alliances will be tenuous across policy domains. With this greater latitude, even small and medium-sized states may band-wagon on security but will balance, hedge and even pursue strategic autonomy in others. Terms like ‘allies’, ‘competitors’, ‘rivals’, and even ‘adversaries’ become contingent on the policy issue. It is a world that American and Chinese policy makers will find challenging, indeed frustrating, because of the inconstancy of allied behaviour.
AB - Academics, decision-makers and policy makers have suggested that COVID and the war in Ukraine represent an ‘inflection point’. The consequence will be ‘the end of globalisation’, ‘a bipolar Cold War 2.0’ and a return to Containment. In reality, the emerging world order is much messier. The logics of geoeconomics and geopolitics, largely aligned during the Cold War, are now in tension, ruptured by decades of globalisation, America's decline, and China's ascent. Consequently, US security allies now often wrestle with the fact that their economic ties link them to US rivals, notably China, or adversaries, like Russia. The pandemic and war have wrought geopolitical and economic adjustments, but any resemblance to Cold War blocs is superficial. What is consolidating is an era best described as fuzzy bifurcation. Unlike the Cold War, alliances will be tenuous across policy domains. With this greater latitude, even small and medium-sized states may band-wagon on security but will balance, hedge and even pursue strategic autonomy in others. Terms like ‘allies’, ‘competitors’, ‘rivals’, and even ‘adversaries’ become contingent on the policy issue. It is a world that American and Chinese policy makers will find challenging, indeed frustrating, because of the inconstancy of allied behaviour.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137748696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137748696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13141
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13141
M3 - Article
SN - 1758-5880
VL - 13
SP - 627
EP - 639
JO - Global Policy
JF - Global Policy
IS - 5
ER -