The eIF2 kinase PERK and the integrated stress response facilitate activation of ATF6 during endoplasmic reticulum stress

Brian F. Teske, Sheree A. Wek, Piyawan Bunpo, Judy K. Cundiff, Jeanette N. McClintick, Tracy Anthony, Ronald C. Wek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

168 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disruptions of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that perturb protein folding cause ER stress and elicit an unfolded protein response (UPR) that involves translational and transcriptional changes in gene expression aimed at expanding the ER processing capacity and alleviating cellular injury. Three ER stress sensors (PERK, ATF6, and IRE1) implement the UPR. PERK phosphorylation of the α subunit of eIF2 during ER stress represses protein synthesis, which prevents further influx of ER client proteins. Phosphorylation of eIF2α (eIF2α∼P) also induces preferential translation of ATF4, a transcription activator of the integrated stress response. In this study we show that the PERK/eIF2α∼P/ATF4 pathway is required not only for translational control, but also for activation of ATF6 and its target genes. The PERK pathway facilitates both the synthesis of ATF6 and trafficking of ATF6 from the ER to the Golgi for intramembrane proteolysis and activation of ATF6. As a consequence, liver-specific depletion of PERK significantly reduces both the translational and transcriptional phases of the UPR, leading to reduced protein chaperone expression, disruptions of lipid metabolism, and enhanced apoptosis. These findings show that the regulatory networks of the UPR are fully integrated and help explain the diverse biological defects associated with loss of PERK.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4390-4405
Number of pages16
JournalMolecular Biology of the Cell
Volume22
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Unfolded Protein Response
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
Endoplasmic Reticulum
Phosphorylation
Protein Folding
Heat-Shock Proteins
Lipid Metabolism
Proteolysis
Proteins
Apoptosis
Gene Expression
PERK kinase
Liver
Wounds and Injuries
Genes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Teske, Brian F. ; Wek, Sheree A. ; Bunpo, Piyawan ; Cundiff, Judy K. ; McClintick, Jeanette N. ; Anthony, Tracy ; Wek, Ronald C. / The eIF2 kinase PERK and the integrated stress response facilitate activation of ATF6 during endoplasmic reticulum stress. In: Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 22. pp. 4390-4405.
@article{ee7e9d5cef1a4ab29c48eabe54ca29b3,
title = "The eIF2 kinase PERK and the integrated stress response facilitate activation of ATF6 during endoplasmic reticulum stress",
abstract = "Disruptions of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that perturb protein folding cause ER stress and elicit an unfolded protein response (UPR) that involves translational and transcriptional changes in gene expression aimed at expanding the ER processing capacity and alleviating cellular injury. Three ER stress sensors (PERK, ATF6, and IRE1) implement the UPR. PERK phosphorylation of the α subunit of eIF2 during ER stress represses protein synthesis, which prevents further influx of ER client proteins. Phosphorylation of eIF2α (eIF2α∼P) also induces preferential translation of ATF4, a transcription activator of the integrated stress response. In this study we show that the PERK/eIF2α∼P/ATF4 pathway is required not only for translational control, but also for activation of ATF6 and its target genes. The PERK pathway facilitates both the synthesis of ATF6 and trafficking of ATF6 from the ER to the Golgi for intramembrane proteolysis and activation of ATF6. As a consequence, liver-specific depletion of PERK significantly reduces both the translational and transcriptional phases of the UPR, leading to reduced protein chaperone expression, disruptions of lipid metabolism, and enhanced apoptosis. These findings show that the regulatory networks of the UPR are fully integrated and help explain the diverse biological defects associated with loss of PERK.",
author = "Teske, {Brian F.} and Wek, {Sheree A.} and Piyawan Bunpo and Cundiff, {Judy K.} and McClintick, {Jeanette N.} and Tracy Anthony and Wek, {Ronald C.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-06-0510",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "4390--4405",
journal = "Molecular Biology of the Cell",
issn = "1059-1524",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "22",

}

The eIF2 kinase PERK and the integrated stress response facilitate activation of ATF6 during endoplasmic reticulum stress. / Teske, Brian F.; Wek, Sheree A.; Bunpo, Piyawan; Cundiff, Judy K.; McClintick, Jeanette N.; Anthony, Tracy; Wek, Ronald C.

In: Molecular Biology of the Cell, Vol. 22, No. 22, 15.11.2011, p. 4390-4405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The eIF2 kinase PERK and the integrated stress response facilitate activation of ATF6 during endoplasmic reticulum stress

AU - Teske, Brian F.

AU - Wek, Sheree A.

AU - Bunpo, Piyawan

AU - Cundiff, Judy K.

AU - McClintick, Jeanette N.

AU - Anthony, Tracy

AU - Wek, Ronald C.

PY - 2011/11/15

Y1 - 2011/11/15

N2 - Disruptions of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that perturb protein folding cause ER stress and elicit an unfolded protein response (UPR) that involves translational and transcriptional changes in gene expression aimed at expanding the ER processing capacity and alleviating cellular injury. Three ER stress sensors (PERK, ATF6, and IRE1) implement the UPR. PERK phosphorylation of the α subunit of eIF2 during ER stress represses protein synthesis, which prevents further influx of ER client proteins. Phosphorylation of eIF2α (eIF2α∼P) also induces preferential translation of ATF4, a transcription activator of the integrated stress response. In this study we show that the PERK/eIF2α∼P/ATF4 pathway is required not only for translational control, but also for activation of ATF6 and its target genes. The PERK pathway facilitates both the synthesis of ATF6 and trafficking of ATF6 from the ER to the Golgi for intramembrane proteolysis and activation of ATF6. As a consequence, liver-specific depletion of PERK significantly reduces both the translational and transcriptional phases of the UPR, leading to reduced protein chaperone expression, disruptions of lipid metabolism, and enhanced apoptosis. These findings show that the regulatory networks of the UPR are fully integrated and help explain the diverse biological defects associated with loss of PERK.

AB - Disruptions of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that perturb protein folding cause ER stress and elicit an unfolded protein response (UPR) that involves translational and transcriptional changes in gene expression aimed at expanding the ER processing capacity and alleviating cellular injury. Three ER stress sensors (PERK, ATF6, and IRE1) implement the UPR. PERK phosphorylation of the α subunit of eIF2 during ER stress represses protein synthesis, which prevents further influx of ER client proteins. Phosphorylation of eIF2α (eIF2α∼P) also induces preferential translation of ATF4, a transcription activator of the integrated stress response. In this study we show that the PERK/eIF2α∼P/ATF4 pathway is required not only for translational control, but also for activation of ATF6 and its target genes. The PERK pathway facilitates both the synthesis of ATF6 and trafficking of ATF6 from the ER to the Golgi for intramembrane proteolysis and activation of ATF6. As a consequence, liver-specific depletion of PERK significantly reduces both the translational and transcriptional phases of the UPR, leading to reduced protein chaperone expression, disruptions of lipid metabolism, and enhanced apoptosis. These findings show that the regulatory networks of the UPR are fully integrated and help explain the diverse biological defects associated with loss of PERK.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81755184374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81755184374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-06-0510

DO - https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-06-0510

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 4390

EP - 4405

JO - Molecular Biology of the Cell

JF - Molecular Biology of the Cell

SN - 1059-1524

IS - 22

ER -