The EU’s maritime operations and the future of European Security: learning from operations Atalanta and Sophia

TY - JOUR

T1 - The EU’s maritime operations and the future of European Security

T2 - learning from operations Atalanta and Sophia

AU - Dombrowski, Peter

AU - Reich, Simon

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - The study of maritime operations has generally been neglected in a European Security and Defense Policy debate that often focuses on political will, bureaucratic incoherence, and military interoperability. Nonetheless, maritime operations have played an increasingly important role in the last decade and deserve deeper analysis. First, they provide a valuable optic for identifying a dynamic change in policy priorities over time. Second, they suggest the conditions under which the EU can and cannot fulfill the Brussels leadership’s avowed role as a “global player.” Finally, they also illustrate the EU’s presiding tensions when it comes to external challenges: between rhetoric and behavior, institutionally with NATO, and of the shifting political priorities among national governments. In this article, we compare the EU’s two major maritime operations. The first, Atalanta, is a counter-piracy multilateral operation in cooperation with NATO and non-EU states off the Somali coast. The second, Sophia, has evolved from search and rescue to thwarting migrant flows in the Mediterranean. Among several conclusions, we suggest that the evolution of maritime operations demonstrates an increasing gap—between the EU’s rhetoric of having a global strategy and its regional operational security focus.

AB - The study of maritime operations has generally been neglected in a European Security and Defense Policy debate that often focuses on political will, bureaucratic incoherence, and military interoperability. Nonetheless, maritime operations have played an increasingly important role in the last decade and deserve deeper analysis. First, they provide a valuable optic for identifying a dynamic change in policy priorities over time. Second, they suggest the conditions under which the EU can and cannot fulfill the Brussels leadership’s avowed role as a “global player.” Finally, they also illustrate the EU’s presiding tensions when it comes to external challenges: between rhetoric and behavior, institutionally with NATO, and of the shifting political priorities among national governments. In this article, we compare the EU’s two major maritime operations. The first, Atalanta, is a counter-piracy multilateral operation in cooperation with NATO and non-EU states off the Somali coast. The second, Sophia, has evolved from search and rescue to thwarting migrant flows in the Mediterranean. Among several conclusions, we suggest that the evolution of maritime operations demonstrates an increasing gap—between the EU’s rhetoric of having a global strategy and its regional operational security focus.

KW - Common Security and Foreign Policy

KW - Counter-piracy

KW - European Security and Defense Policy

KW - European Union

KW - Global strategy

KW - Immigration and refugee asylum

KW - Maritime operations

KW - Operation Atalanta

KW - Operation Sophia

KW - Regional strategy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052928332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052928332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41295-018-0131-4

DO - 10.1057/s41295-018-0131-4

M3 - Article

SN - 1472-4790

VL - 17

SP - 860

EP - 884

JO - Comparative European Politics

JF - Comparative European Politics

IS - 6

ER -