Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity

Nick Yeung, Rafal Bogacz, Clay B. Holroyd, Sander Nieuwenhuis, Jonathan D. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been proposed that the error-related negativity (ERN) is generated by phase resetting of theta-band EEG oscillations. The present research evaluates a set of analysis methods that have recently been used to provide evidence for this hypothesis. To evaluate these methods, we apply each of them to two simulated data sets: one set that includes theta phase resetting and a second that comprises phasic peaks embedded in EEG noise. The results indicate that the analysis methods do not effectively distinguish between the two simulated data sets. In particular, the simulated data set constructed from phasic peaks, though containing no synchronization of ongoing EEG activity, demonstrates properties previously interpreted as supporting the synchronized oscillation account of the ERN. These findings suggest that the proposed analysis methods cannot provide unambiguous evidence that the ERN is generated by phase resetting of ongoing oscillations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-49
Number of pages11
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Electroencephalography
Noise
Research
Datasets

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Physiology

Cite this

Yeung, Nick ; Bogacz, Rafal ; Holroyd, Clay B. ; Nieuwenhuis, Sander ; Cohen, Jonathan D. / Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity. In: Psychophysiology. 2007 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 39-49.
@article{5b83b97e197f42f2a78cb418e3b56bdb,
title = "Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity",
abstract = "It has been proposed that the error-related negativity (ERN) is generated by phase resetting of theta-band EEG oscillations. The present research evaluates a set of analysis methods that have recently been used to provide evidence for this hypothesis. To evaluate these methods, we apply each of them to two simulated data sets: one set that includes theta phase resetting and a second that comprises phasic peaks embedded in EEG noise. The results indicate that the analysis methods do not effectively distinguish between the two simulated data sets. In particular, the simulated data set constructed from phasic peaks, though containing no synchronization of ongoing EEG activity, demonstrates properties previously interpreted as supporting the synchronized oscillation account of the ERN. These findings suggest that the proposed analysis methods cannot provide unambiguous evidence that the ERN is generated by phase resetting of ongoing oscillations.",
author = "Nick Yeung and Rafal Bogacz and Holroyd, {Clay B.} and Sander Nieuwenhuis and Cohen, {Jonathan D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00482.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "39--49",
journal = "Psychophysiology",
issn = "0048-5772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Yeung, N, Bogacz, R, Holroyd, CB, Nieuwenhuis, S & Cohen, JD 2007, 'Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity', Psychophysiology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00482.x

Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity. / Yeung, Nick; Bogacz, Rafal; Holroyd, Clay B.; Nieuwenhuis, Sander; Cohen, Jonathan D.

In: Psychophysiology, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 39-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity

AU - Yeung, Nick

AU - Bogacz, Rafal

AU - Holroyd, Clay B.

AU - Nieuwenhuis, Sander

AU - Cohen, Jonathan D.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - It has been proposed that the error-related negativity (ERN) is generated by phase resetting of theta-band EEG oscillations. The present research evaluates a set of analysis methods that have recently been used to provide evidence for this hypothesis. To evaluate these methods, we apply each of them to two simulated data sets: one set that includes theta phase resetting and a second that comprises phasic peaks embedded in EEG noise. The results indicate that the analysis methods do not effectively distinguish between the two simulated data sets. In particular, the simulated data set constructed from phasic peaks, though containing no synchronization of ongoing EEG activity, demonstrates properties previously interpreted as supporting the synchronized oscillation account of the ERN. These findings suggest that the proposed analysis methods cannot provide unambiguous evidence that the ERN is generated by phase resetting of ongoing oscillations.

AB - It has been proposed that the error-related negativity (ERN) is generated by phase resetting of theta-band EEG oscillations. The present research evaluates a set of analysis methods that have recently been used to provide evidence for this hypothesis. To evaluate these methods, we apply each of them to two simulated data sets: one set that includes theta phase resetting and a second that comprises phasic peaks embedded in EEG noise. The results indicate that the analysis methods do not effectively distinguish between the two simulated data sets. In particular, the simulated data set constructed from phasic peaks, though containing no synchronization of ongoing EEG activity, demonstrates properties previously interpreted as supporting the synchronized oscillation account of the ERN. These findings suggest that the proposed analysis methods cannot provide unambiguous evidence that the ERN is generated by phase resetting of ongoing oscillations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846222405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846222405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00482.x

DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00482.x

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 39

EP - 49

JO - Psychophysiology

JF - Psychophysiology

SN - 0048-5772

IS - 1

ER -