TYPE OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND ITS IMPACT ON COLLABORATIVE NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

ELLEN THOMAS, MICHAEL OBAL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While integrating suppliers into producer new product development (NPD) would appear to be beneficial, there lacks a consensus as to what knowledge should be shared between producers and suppliers, especially within turbulent environments. This paper examines how in-depth and complex the knowledge sharing should be between producers and suppliers, given varying environmental conditions. To this point, we propose that small-scale technical exchanges are generally more effective in collaborative NPD efforts than more complex technology transfers. We also analyze two forms of environmental uncertainty, market turbulence and technology turbulence, as they influence the knowledge sharing measures. A survey of project managers reveals that while technical exchanges positively influence NPD performance, technology transfers have no impact (except in radical product development projects) and thus may not always be appropriate in producer–supplier NPD collaborations. We also find that market turbulence and technology turbulence influence technical exchanges, but in differing manners.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Innovation Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Product development
Turbulence
Technology transfer
Managers
New product development
Knowledge sharing
Suppliers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{d7c27d0e2b2248a8a7915fd6a02cb5a7,
title = "TYPE OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND ITS IMPACT ON COLLABORATIVE NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT",
abstract = "While integrating suppliers into producer new product development (NPD) would appear to be beneficial, there lacks a consensus as to what knowledge should be shared between producers and suppliers, especially within turbulent environments. This paper examines how in-depth and complex the knowledge sharing should be between producers and suppliers, given varying environmental conditions. To this point, we propose that small-scale technical exchanges are generally more effective in collaborative NPD efforts than more complex technology transfers. We also analyze two forms of environmental uncertainty, market turbulence and technology turbulence, as they influence the knowledge sharing measures. A survey of project managers reveals that while technical exchanges positively influence NPD performance, technology transfers have no impact (except in radical product development projects) and thus may not always be appropriate in producer–supplier NPD collaborations. We also find that market turbulence and technology turbulence influence technical exchanges, but in differing manners.",
author = "ELLEN THOMAS and MICHAEL OBAL",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500202",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Innovation Management",
issn = "1363-9196",
publisher = "World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TYPE OF KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND ITS IMPACT ON COLLABORATIVE NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

AU - THOMAS, ELLEN

AU - OBAL, MICHAEL

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - While integrating suppliers into producer new product development (NPD) would appear to be beneficial, there lacks a consensus as to what knowledge should be shared between producers and suppliers, especially within turbulent environments. This paper examines how in-depth and complex the knowledge sharing should be between producers and suppliers, given varying environmental conditions. To this point, we propose that small-scale technical exchanges are generally more effective in collaborative NPD efforts than more complex technology transfers. We also analyze two forms of environmental uncertainty, market turbulence and technology turbulence, as they influence the knowledge sharing measures. A survey of project managers reveals that while technical exchanges positively influence NPD performance, technology transfers have no impact (except in radical product development projects) and thus may not always be appropriate in producer–supplier NPD collaborations. We also find that market turbulence and technology turbulence influence technical exchanges, but in differing manners.

AB - While integrating suppliers into producer new product development (NPD) would appear to be beneficial, there lacks a consensus as to what knowledge should be shared between producers and suppliers, especially within turbulent environments. This paper examines how in-depth and complex the knowledge sharing should be between producers and suppliers, given varying environmental conditions. To this point, we propose that small-scale technical exchanges are generally more effective in collaborative NPD efforts than more complex technology transfers. We also analyze two forms of environmental uncertainty, market turbulence and technology turbulence, as they influence the knowledge sharing measures. A survey of project managers reveals that while technical exchanges positively influence NPD performance, technology transfers have no impact (except in radical product development projects) and thus may not always be appropriate in producer–supplier NPD collaborations. We also find that market turbulence and technology turbulence influence technical exchanges, but in differing manners.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021817471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021817471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500202

DO - https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500202

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Innovation Management

JF - International Journal of Innovation Management

SN - 1363-9196

ER -