TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding voter vengeance
AU - Bechwati, Nada Nasr
AU - Morrin, Maureen
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - This article proposes that, in electoral contexts, decision makers may experience a desire for vengeance or a desire to "get even" with an entity, such as a political candidate, in response to a perceived wrongdoing. This article draws on research from the domains of psychology and sociology to develop a theoretical framework for examining factors that may influence the extent to which voters exact revenge on political candidates with their voting behavior. The results of 3 experiments are reported in which voters are shown to exact revenge on a candidate who has won an earlier round of elections by defeating a favored candidate. This process is mediated by damage to self-identity and is strengthened by perceived share of blame attributed to the perpetrator candidate. This research shows how vengeful voters are delighted when a perpetrator candidate later performs poorly while in office. This research also shows how making salient a shared affiliation with the perpetrator candidate (such as race or university major) can attenuate vengeful voting behavior. The research builds on a growing body of work that explores negative and potentially counterproductive emotions in choice contexts.
AB - This article proposes that, in electoral contexts, decision makers may experience a desire for vengeance or a desire to "get even" with an entity, such as a political candidate, in response to a perceived wrongdoing. This article draws on research from the domains of psychology and sociology to develop a theoretical framework for examining factors that may influence the extent to which voters exact revenge on political candidates with their voting behavior. The results of 3 experiments are reported in which voters are shown to exact revenge on a candidate who has won an earlier round of elections by defeating a favored candidate. This process is mediated by damage to self-identity and is strengthened by perceived share of blame attributed to the perpetrator candidate. This research shows how vengeful voters are delighted when a perpetrator candidate later performs poorly while in office. This research also shows how making salient a shared affiliation with the perpetrator candidate (such as race or university major) can attenuate vengeful voting behavior. The research builds on a growing body of work that explores negative and potentially counterproductive emotions in choice contexts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36348975076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36348975076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70038-4
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70038-4
M3 - Article
SN - 1057-7408
VL - 17
SP - 277
EP - 291
JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology
JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology
IS - 4
ER -