Universal demand laws and stakeholders: Evidence from the auditor's perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of universal demand (UD) laws, which limit shareholders' ability to initiate derivative litigation against firms and auditors, on the behavior of external auditors. After confirming that UD laws reduce the likelihood that clients (auditors) will be named in this type of litigation, we find that firms incorporated in states that have adopted UD laws have lower increases in audit fees than states that have not adopted such laws. These results are magnified for firms when the client's (auditor's) bargaining power is high (low) but not for those actively engaged in derivative litigation, suggesting that auditors are able to distinguish actively the firms that benefit from the lower risk of derivative litigation. We do not find evidence that reporting quality declines as a result of these reduced fees. Our results suggest that UD laws relieve unnecessary burdens imposed by excessive derivative litigation on firms and auditors.

Original languageAmerican English
Article number100766
JournalAdvances in Accounting
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance

Keywords

  • Audit fees
  • Audit quality
  • Derivative litigation
  • Financial reporting quality
  • Litigation risk
  • Universal demand law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Universal demand laws and stakeholders: Evidence from the auditor's perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this