When tokens matter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tokens, or low levels of minority or female representatives in state legislatures, have been studied with respect to their perceptions of self-efficacy and political attitudes but not with respect to their actual influence on the passage of public policy. This paper uses state-level data from the child support program between the years 1976-84 to measure the influence of women tokens on the policy process. Using ordered probit models, I explore policy adoption under three configurations: (1) a test of the independent impact of tokens, (2) a dynamic test of the differential impact of tokens and nontokens to analyze potential backlash effects and the potential diffusion of policy preferences, and (3) an interactive test on the potential for tokens to form coalitions. My analysis strongly suggests that tokens make a policy difference independently and to a greater extent than when they are on the cusp of becoming nontokens, but I found less support for the idea that tokens successfully form coalitions to achieve specific policy goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-136
Number of pages28
JournalLegislative Studies Quarterly
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

coalition
political attitude
self-efficacy
public policy
minority

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Crowley, Jocelyn. / When tokens matter. In: Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2004 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 109-136.
@article{e6799ba24e7d48e28b29b3eb1febdd60,
title = "When tokens matter",
abstract = "Tokens, or low levels of minority or female representatives in state legislatures, have been studied with respect to their perceptions of self-efficacy and political attitudes but not with respect to their actual influence on the passage of public policy. This paper uses state-level data from the child support program between the years 1976-84 to measure the influence of women tokens on the policy process. Using ordered probit models, I explore policy adoption under three configurations: (1) a test of the independent impact of tokens, (2) a dynamic test of the differential impact of tokens and nontokens to analyze potential backlash effects and the potential diffusion of policy preferences, and (3) an interactive test on the potential for tokens to form coalitions. My analysis strongly suggests that tokens make a policy difference independently and to a greater extent than when they are on the cusp of becoming nontokens, but I found less support for the idea that tokens successfully form coalitions to achieve specific policy goals.",
author = "Jocelyn Crowley",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.3162/036298004X201113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "109--136",
journal = "Legislative Studies Quarterly",
issn = "0362-9805",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

When tokens matter. / Crowley, Jocelyn.

In: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 109-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - When tokens matter

AU - Crowley, Jocelyn

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Tokens, or low levels of minority or female representatives in state legislatures, have been studied with respect to their perceptions of self-efficacy and political attitudes but not with respect to their actual influence on the passage of public policy. This paper uses state-level data from the child support program between the years 1976-84 to measure the influence of women tokens on the policy process. Using ordered probit models, I explore policy adoption under three configurations: (1) a test of the independent impact of tokens, (2) a dynamic test of the differential impact of tokens and nontokens to analyze potential backlash effects and the potential diffusion of policy preferences, and (3) an interactive test on the potential for tokens to form coalitions. My analysis strongly suggests that tokens make a policy difference independently and to a greater extent than when they are on the cusp of becoming nontokens, but I found less support for the idea that tokens successfully form coalitions to achieve specific policy goals.

AB - Tokens, or low levels of minority or female representatives in state legislatures, have been studied with respect to their perceptions of self-efficacy and political attitudes but not with respect to their actual influence on the passage of public policy. This paper uses state-level data from the child support program between the years 1976-84 to measure the influence of women tokens on the policy process. Using ordered probit models, I explore policy adoption under three configurations: (1) a test of the independent impact of tokens, (2) a dynamic test of the differential impact of tokens and nontokens to analyze potential backlash effects and the potential diffusion of policy preferences, and (3) an interactive test on the potential for tokens to form coalitions. My analysis strongly suggests that tokens make a policy difference independently and to a greater extent than when they are on the cusp of becoming nontokens, but I found less support for the idea that tokens successfully form coalitions to achieve specific policy goals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143127843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143127843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.3162/036298004X201113

DO - https://doi.org/10.3162/036298004X201113

M3 - Review article

VL - 29

SP - 109

EP - 136

JO - Legislative Studies Quarterly

JF - Legislative Studies Quarterly

SN - 0362-9805

IS - 1

ER -