Why Women Earn High Marks: Examining the Role of Partisanship and Gender in Political Evaluations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We present the results of a randomized survey experiment demonstrating that the public evaluates women politicians more highly than men across multiple characteristic assessments. This finding is consistent with a recent wave of research indicating greater preferences for women politicians. Which respondents rate women politicians more highly, and why? We find that women and younger voters do not account for the greater marks given to women politicians. Instead, respondent partisanship and the presumed partisanship of the politician account for a great deal of our findings, with gender playing a complicating role. Democratic and Republican respondents are apt to project their own partisanship onto politicians, and across both parties, we find higher assessments for co-partisan politicians and for women politicians. On the whole, women politicians are evaluated on par with or significantly higher than men politicians across six characteristics, scoring especially well relative to men when politicians are presumed to be members of the opposing party and when traditionally feminine characteristics are assessed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)768-797
Number of pages30
JournalPolitics and Gender
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Keywords

  • Women in politics
  • public opinion
  • survey experiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Women Earn High Marks: Examining the Role of Partisanship and Gender in Political Evaluations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this